sdwulfdawg said:
Of course with the absolutely meteoric stunning success of XTRA-AM 600 and the absolutely meteroric stunning success of FM "La Pantera" 105.7 here in San Diego when they flipped to "en espagnol," proves just because you try to program to a dominant demographic does not mean an overnight success. There is a thing called "saturation" which the radio (and TV) broadcast industry just does not seem to "get."
XETRA 690 (I presume you did not mean they had taken over KOGO's channel!) is targeted at LA, not SD. The studio is in Burbank, and most of the talent has LA experience. However, the programming is wretched and unneeded as there are local stations with decent signals covering LA with news and talk in Spanish. In other words, it is failing because it is bad, not because of saturation.
Similarly, the FM offered nothing that established stations did not offer, and put on a morning talent on the US Mexican border who is Honduran; that same show was cancelled on 20 of his 24 affiliates in 2006 because it was not working. Again, a bad station.
The market has around 15 signals in Spanish; only 6 or 7 show in the ratings. The bad stations are "self-limiting" since they are not getting any listening in the US.
In this case, the situation has nothing to do with "saturation" but with good programming vs. bad. Saturation occurs when you have 6 country shares in a market and three staitons; three good stations will each get about 2, and none will get many buys as they are below the point of interest for ad agencies. There is one station, at least, too many. Saturation.
In the case of Spanish language programming, recognize that Spanish is a language, not a format. There are about 12 to 14 Spanish language shares in SD, divided among a variety of formats and sharing patterns. the good stations in each format will get good shares, the bad ones will not.