Wow. Didn't expect to get such anger from a simple question. I hardly will base any buy on what is said on this board. In fact, I try to give a sales perspective to a board that is programming driven. What I find offensive is when I see some agency media buys placed by just looking at a two book and grinding out a CPP without even paying attention to what stations they bought. Worse is when a station changes format and they don't want to change the buy because it is "too much work." Believe it or not there are a few of us in agencies who actually take the time to look beyond the numbers, at what is going on in a market, to make sure our client gets not only their CPP goals, but RESULTS! The best media buyers get information from everywhere and then seperate fact from fiction. Ratings are history, buys are made for months into the future. In defense of this Board, some of the discussion here is well thought out, much slanted. Do you think the information we get from account execs isn't slanted toward their station? Good media buying means seeing the truth as best you can from every source. A good media buyer knows that whenever you make a decision get as much information as you can. I enjoy getting multiple perspectives, but trust me, no single source will determine a buy. I can't say the same for my media buyer brethern, many just trust a single source: Arbitron. It is the major factor, but shouldn't be the ONLY factor. Media buying is part looking at history, part looking at the future and then negotiating like hell to get a good deal.For what it's worth Dan, in my book I know where you're coming from and I know you're not making a buy based on this board.That said, if I were your client, and I learned the question you posed here, I would be asking a lot more questions. Based on the knowledge you have demonstrated before, I think you'd be able to convince me to make the buy you recommend.