A
autopaint-1
Guest
And again, this is off topic. Talking about Wi-Fi has nothing to do with IBOC. If you want to talk about Wi-Fi take it where people are interested. thank you.
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
7
700WLW
Guest
IBOCRocks: "First of all, nice job editing your post after I leave. Seriously, your cyber-stalking makes me nervous. Anyway, I never said internet radio USAGE was 1%. Let's look at the quote: "Maybe 1% have an internet radio." As in the physical radio, like the rocku. So you misunderstood me. Wouldn't be the first time. See - you will do anything to start a fight! You could have politely asked for a clarification, but instead you attack me and accuse me of logging in while you post (which is disturbing to say the least).As for starting an argument, I am replying to your attack. Again, why are you so angry with me? It is because I have a difference of opinion? Anyway, I would appreciate it if you'd stop monitoring how I spend my time here, it's un-nerving"
I am not monitoring you - you are stalking me, and I find it VERY unnerving that every time I post/reply you log on and quickly reply. Now, for the fifth time, you have responded AGAIN to my posts, after I have asked you to STOP, and that you indicated you were done with this conversation FIVE posts ago. STOP !. Obvioulsy, more than 1% have Internet Radio, which I am sure you know, with 56 miilion Inter Radio listeners per week. I NEVER personally attacked you, which I have already pointed out, but you assume negative posts about IBOC are attacking you - stop being so sensitive ! YOU are making posting here VERY difficult, with your constant accusations, that you can't back up. STOP logging on and quickly responding to my posts - this obsessive behavior is highly unusual. You were still logged on, after I modified my post, so stop making accusations that you can't back up ! Now, keep your word, and STOP replying to this thread !
BTW, after a month, my review finally showed up on Radio Shack ! Here is another one, off RS:
"The Receptor HD is a good example of an "early adopter" product. It is a good idea, not quite ready for prime time. The sensitivity in the HD mode leaves a lot to be desired. I had to use a rooftop antenna to pickup local HD stations. The price is way too high for what it is, but that is to be expected with a brand new product like this. The sound tends to be on the bassy side (which some people may like). This is certainly not high fidelity and it is certainly not CD quality. The miniscule data rates for HD radio permit only an "acceptable" sound quality. This is a good start, but HD radio has a long way to go before it will be accepted by the masses."
See, I was right - you need the dipole mounted on the roof, or in the attic !
;D
I am not monitoring you - you are stalking me, and I find it VERY unnerving that every time I post/reply you log on and quickly reply. Now, for the fifth time, you have responded AGAIN to my posts, after I have asked you to STOP, and that you indicated you were done with this conversation FIVE posts ago. STOP !. Obvioulsy, more than 1% have Internet Radio, which I am sure you know, with 56 miilion Inter Radio listeners per week. I NEVER personally attacked you, which I have already pointed out, but you assume negative posts about IBOC are attacking you - stop being so sensitive ! YOU are making posting here VERY difficult, with your constant accusations, that you can't back up. STOP logging on and quickly responding to my posts - this obsessive behavior is highly unusual. You were still logged on, after I modified my post, so stop making accusations that you can't back up ! Now, keep your word, and STOP replying to this thread !
BTW, after a month, my review finally showed up on Radio Shack ! Here is another one, off RS:
"The Receptor HD is a good example of an "early adopter" product. It is a good idea, not quite ready for prime time. The sensitivity in the HD mode leaves a lot to be desired. I had to use a rooftop antenna to pickup local HD stations. The price is way too high for what it is, but that is to be expected with a brand new product like this. The sound tends to be on the bassy side (which some people may like). This is certainly not high fidelity and it is certainly not CD quality. The miniscule data rates for HD radio permit only an "acceptable" sound quality. This is a good start, but HD radio has a long way to go before it will be accepted by the masses."
See, I was right - you need the dipole mounted on the roof, or in the attic !
;D- Status