Re: "armchair quarterbacking."
I've come to realize that most of the "naysaying" comes from those not in the game anymore. Ya know, the usual "radio is dying" and "radio is dead" and "today's radio sucks by comparison to (insert former era)."
Sure, there aren't live and local shifts 24/7 anymore on most stations anymore, and while I'd personally love that in all the top 50 markets and as close to that as possible in the top 100 or top 150, let's also admit that there were plenty (and I mean PLENTY) of bad jocks with F/T gigs prior to the 1997 Telecom Act and subsequent consolidation craze, too, please.
I'm not one to believe that jockless music-intensive shifts on contemporary stations are good for the overall station product, mind you, but I also don't think staffing a midday or overnight shift with a wanna-be standup comedian (as was quite the norm in the 1980s and early 1990s) endears listeners, either.
That era of radio DJ rarely tried to engage with their audience so much as they hollered at 'em, crack a one-liner and nailed the post. That, in my mind, is why alternative radio came in and pantsed pop stations in the early 1990s. Their jocks were far more relatable to their audience and went out to schmooze with their listeners at small clubs and venues where their acts came to play.
I, too, prefer to read these boards when someone gets into specifics; an outside ear is INVALUABLE to folks like me still in the trenches, fighting the good fight. Simple, one-line, "(insert call letters or whole market) sucks" isn't constructive, but just gives off a perception that someone's gnawing on sour grapes.
Carry on, gentlemen (and ladies, too!)