Z
zumahans
Guest
"Yeah but it's the New York Times and it's a newspaper and so they are a competitor and that means they will be unfair to us."
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Whatever.
That is not going to cut it.
A dispassionate reporter, reviewing the same Arbitron data that is so often alluded to here, says radio listening is down across the board.
Down 15.0 percent for age 12-17.
Down 15.3 percent for age 18-24.
Down 13.2 percent for age 25-34.
Etc. etc.
The stock of the five largest broadcasting companies, in the past three years, has dropped 30-60 percent.
And the newspaper article duly points out that only the newspaper industry is falling faster than radio.
So, maybe now we know why a certain "frequent flier" in this forum is so reluctant to let anyone see the numbers that he loves to quote.
The entire article is at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/media/15radio.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
(registration may be required)
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Whatever.
That is not going to cut it.
A dispassionate reporter, reviewing the same Arbitron data that is so often alluded to here, says radio listening is down across the board.
Down 15.0 percent for age 12-17.
Down 15.3 percent for age 18-24.
Down 13.2 percent for age 25-34.
Etc. etc.
The stock of the five largest broadcasting companies, in the past three years, has dropped 30-60 percent.
And the newspaper article duly points out that only the newspaper industry is falling faster than radio.
So, maybe now we know why a certain "frequent flier" in this forum is so reluctant to let anyone see the numbers that he loves to quote.
The entire article is at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/media/15radio.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
(registration may be required)