DesiArnez6 said:
However Below 87.7 FM as I went further down, I heard every single station perfectly, in the same proportion from WBLS 107.5 down to Hot 97 , down to Now 92.3 etc all the way down to 91.5 (That was the lowest station I could hear) then my dial stopped. The exact amount of Mhz in separation remained the same throughout the entire 70-87 FM band, and I got every station from WNYE 91.5 to 107.5 crisp clear (nothing below 91.5) because there was no further space. I wish I had realized this during analog TV broadcasting (*slaps hand to forehead) THAT would have made for a good experiment
...
From the descriptions you guys gave, at first I assumed it was "harmonics" (which I don't actually understand) but I didn't get anything above 107.5 . I am also not near the Empire State Building and then images? (Also don't understand)
Harmonic: A signal on a
multiple of the station's desired frequency. For WBLS-107.5, the 2nd harmonic is on 107.5*2=215MHz. The 3rd harmonic is on 107.5*3=322.5MHz, etc... (theoretically WBLS's "first harmonic" would be on 107.5*1=107.5MHz, but in practice the term "first harmonic" is almost never used)
Harmonics can be transmitter faults. They can also be externally generated, either in your receiver or in other electronic gear near the transmitter. With FM stations, the modulation also increases with the order of the harmonic -- WBLS's 2nd harmonic would be 200% modulated, their 3rd harmonic 300%, etc...
Image: The spurious response of your receiver to a signal whose frequency has a specific relation, through the receiver's "intermediate frequency", to the frequency the receiver is tuned to. An image response is usually separated from the frequency the receiver is tuned to by twice the "intermediate frequency". The intermediate frequency of most FM radios is 10.7MHz, so the image response of most FM radios is to a frequency 21.4MHz higher than the frequency to which the receiver is tuned.
Note that 70.9+21.4=92.3. The signals you're hearing are images.
Images are always a
receiver characteristic - they are not a transmitter fault.
There are other possible ways of receiving signals that aren't really there, or of generating signals that a station doesn't intend to generate.
_________________________________________________
Presuming you live well within the NYC area (the desired signals are strong) I don't think there's anything wrong or necessarily "cheap" about your radio.
Most FM radios don't have a very good "preselector" circuit for rejecting images: they don't need it. Normally the only signals in the "image band" 21.4MHz above the FM band are aircraft stations. These aren't very powerful and can't cause much interference to FM reception.
I think the only reason you're hearing this is because your radio is (unusually) capable of tuning these lower frequencies below 88MHz. I think if most other FM radios could tune this band, they'd receive the same spurious signals.