First, the station is "home" to the Milwaukee radio market. Second, its 60 dbu signal only reaches about 1,4 million total people in two separate markets, and the Milwaukee & Chicago markets are a total of 1.8 million and 9.6 million combined. This is a station on the border of two markets that does not cover either one very well.Can someone give me the scoop on why it's underperforming? A .5? Jesus.
First, the station is "home" to the Milwaukee radio market. Second, its 60 dbu signal only reaches about 1,4 million total people in two separate markets, and the Milwaukee & Chicago markets are a total of 1.8 million and 9.6 million combined. This is a station on the border of two markets that does not cover either one very well.
However, Kenosha County, WI, is in the Chicago radio market. But you are correct that the station hardly covers any of the Chicago market well.Not a good enough signal to cover much of the Chicago Market. Tower is in Wisconsin, four miles North of the State Line.
From what I remember of them, and I used to listen on occasion when I lived in NW Cook County, they put a decent signal in there (Schaumburg/Palatine/Arlington Heights area), but it didn't go much further south. They were a piece of cake in Lake County IL, and most of the way to Milwaukee.Considering all of the above, they actually do pretty good in Chicago. They focus on the WI-IL border areas, hence the call letters.
I bought my first house in Wauconda in 1983, so I know the area well (although my house has since been torn down and a larger one built). I lived in Franklin Park in 1975-76, and don't remember receiving it there.Keith, thats about right. My dad lives in Wauconda and its golden there. You get to even Mount Prospect and it's fading. I would assume by Itasca it's toast and I wouldn't expect to hear it in Franklin Park.
My guess is it makes it difficult to impossible to hear in many areas without an outdoor directional antenna, and even then, depending on location, that may not help. That is certainly the situation around Detroit, where translators (and recent Canadian drop ins) have made reception from neighboring markets difficult to impossible. You have to wonder whether it's just the high HAAT of the translators not conforming to 1960 era FCC propagation models, or whether they are not operating with their licensed power.I wonder if the Streetz 95.1 translators have made reception more difficult than before in northern Cook County?
Yeah, tower issue is the problem. Agree the music is on point, imaging and production as well.Not a good enough signal to cover much of the Chicago Market. Tower is in Wisconsin, four miles North of the State Line. And it's HAAT is 117 meters, not the Class B reference maximum of 150 meters.
Thats a great area to live. Back in the 90's we lived in Ivanhoe. Enjoyed Sylvan Lake. Good times.I bought my first house in Wauconda in 1983, so I know the area well (although my house has since been torn down and a larger one built). I lived in Franklin Park in 1975-76, and don't remember receiving it there.
They aren't owned by iHurt, Clueless, Idiocy, etc??? 😂I'm in Dallas and have never lived in Chicago.
Question though, I just looked at WIIL's playlist and it's perfect. It's doing exactly what it should be doing.
Can someone give me the scoop on why it's underperforming? A .5? Jesus.
I think if they had to do Proofs of Performance on their DAs, we'd find that those nulls to the North aren't as deep as they are supposed to be. Just a general comment on the whole translator situation, not specifics.WIIL will only get south of Mount Prospect with a decent signal in tropo conditions. Plus, a 60-watt translator (W236CF, relaying WOJO-FM HD2) is planted atop Sears Tower and gets out quite well to the south (and has a permit for extending its reach west and southeast).