So here we are, two-and-a-half years removed from the start of the less-than-successful national "Free-FM" rollout (David Lee Roth, we hardly knew ye). Of course, once Dan Mason hopped on board, these stations were either flipped, or kept their talk format, but shed the "Free-FM" name.
Yet in June 2008, 97.1 in L.A. is the only station left standing with the "Free-FM" branding. No other creative names out there? Even reverting back to "Real Radio 97.1" could sound good at this point.
My point is, why would you continue to associate yourself with a branding that's failed in the rest of the country?
Yet in June 2008, 97.1 in L.A. is the only station left standing with the "Free-FM" branding. No other creative names out there? Even reverting back to "Real Radio 97.1" could sound good at this point.
My point is, why would you continue to associate yourself with a branding that's failed in the rest of the country?