ShowLow said:
Pretty clear in Tucson all the space the FCC has granted the stations is not being used. I guess my issue is the DTV promise is just not being realized IMO, at least not in Tucson.
- A DTV station *must* transmit 19.2MBps of data if that signal is to decode at the receiver. 19.2MB turns out to not be enough to transmit even a standard-definition program -- let alone HD -- without compression. The more programs you transmit, and/or the higher definition each program, the more you must compress it to fit.
So transmitting a SD signal, and/or not transmitting any subchannels, doesn't really leave part of your 19.2MB unused. It actually means better picture quality on the program(s) you do transmit.
(some stations compress aggressively *without* transmitting multiple programs, which truly can be wasteful. You have to fill out the 19.2MB with *something*, and some stations fill with null packets which are completely ignored by the receiver...)
From what little I know of DTV each channel can use up to SIX sub- channels.
The number of programs transmitted over a single DTV transmitter is limited only by the number of digits allowed in the minor channel number. (I thought that number was 2 but I'm now aware of a LPTV station in California with three-digit minor channel numbers) The more you compress, the more subs you can fit in. Some stations carry audio-only programs which use MUCH less bandwidth than moving video. I know of another station whose "radio" subchannels do have video -- but it's a stationary slide (with information about the (classical/jazz) selection on the air -- which compresses VERY well.
I know of stations with at least a dozen programs on a single frequency. I suspect they're VERY ugly but the nature of the programming is such that viewers probably have no other choice.
===========
I'd imagine most stations' reason for not running subchannels is non-technical. There are obvious expenses -- for additional video/audio control gear, MPEG encoders, more storage in the video server, graphics "branding" gear, etc.. There are also non-obvious expenses -- purchase of programming, licensing of additional channels of automation control, EAS gear, E/I educational programming for children (yes, it's mandated to air on subchannels).
Many of these aren't on cable. Most of those that are are out in the middle of nowhere in the upper ranges of the digital cable spectrum. I suppose some stations are making money on subchannels but I don't see it as a slam dunk sure thing.