BRENT said:But this is the best music ever made.
Slider7 said:First of all, just because you love it, doesn't make it necessarily a viable format. I have a buddy that listens to Big Band stuff constantly, but I don't think "Glen Miller FM" would be a cash cow for anyone.
Second of all, your statement that we are all getting older is true in the sense that we each are aging every second, however, as you see the Baby Boomers start heading to the big control room in the sky, the average age of Americans will begin to drop over the next 10 years give-or-take, so, we are actually getting a little younger.
BRENT said:Your profile says you are 40. I cannot believe that you would not like a station like this.
BRENT said:All I said is that I so wish that we had a station like this in our Market.
BRENT said:Like I said all we have is Country and Hip-Hop.
middlega said:BRENT said:Like I said all we have is Country and Hip-Hop.
Umm, you do realize that only 3 of the top 25 stations in the book are Country, right?
That's three, the same number of spanish-language stations that are in the top 25 (Wi'07)
Or three, the same number that are playing some rock sub-genre?
Or three, one less than the number of talk-oriented (news+sports) stations in the top 25 in the market?
Or three, one less than the number of AC/CHR stations in the market?
To be honest, I'm starting to wonder if you actually live in the market at all.
Rodney Ho said:Brent-the bottom line is the advertisers don't value listeners 55-plus. And that would be a bulk of the listeners on an oldies station in Atlanta. It's purely a business decision. As noted earlier, stations that skew that old can't charge the rates of a station like Star 94 or Q100 or V-103. I'm 38 and I wish there was a station playing 60s here, too. But there are a finite number of good FM signals in this town and right now, the primary music formats that work are country, top 40, rock and R&B/hip hop (with smooth jazz, too). At least we now have your iPod, satellite radio's 60s stations and plenty of online options as well. Once we get PPMs, or people meters, how stations are measured might benefit certain stations and could open the door to a station that plays more older music. That's what seemed to happen in Philly and may have compelled WCBS-FM in New York to go back to the format (as of tomorrow.) Atlanta won't go to PPMs tili the fall of 2008.
BRENT said:Rodney Ho said:Brent-the bottom line is the advertisers don't value listeners 55-plus. And that would be a bulk of the listeners on an oldies station in Atlanta. It's purely a business decision. As noted earlier, stations that skew that old can't charge the rates of a station like Star 94 or Q100 or V-103. I'm 38 and I wish there was a station playing 60s here, too. But there are a finite number of good FM signals in this town and right now, the primary music formats that work are country, top 40, rock and R&B/hip hop (with smooth jazz, too). At least we now have your iPod, satellite radio's 60s stations and plenty of online options as well. Once we get PPMs, or people meters, how stations are measured might benefit certain stations and could open the door to a station that plays more older music. That's what seemed to happen in Philly and may have compelled WCBS-FM in New York to go back to the format (as of tomorrow.) Atlanta won't go to PPMs tili the fall of 2008.
Thanks Rodney,
That makes sense, but it is so unfair. A few more points though. Oldies, as a format, is not dead. We must remember that the 25-54 advertising agency driven buys are overlooking the same population bump THEY coveted when THEY invented 25-54. And THEY are the ones forcing broadcasters to dump the format. There are millions of "Boomers" with BILLIONS of dollars in buying power out there that the ad agencies are IGNORING. At least as far as radio is concerned.
BRENT said:Very good points. But we are number 8 or 9 now, we have far more people than B'ham, and they have at least three station's like this.