The USA Today was the first example, depending on what they included and how valid/slanted the info is, add to it the 10% receiving unemployment checks (not working, are you more apt to vote for or against the person running for office that wants to cut back your 99 weeks? Are you strong enough to vote for responsibility, or are you going to vote for the guy that wants to not only give you 99 weeks, but even more if he could?).
And a 19% unfavorable rating for Limbaugh is laughable considering over 30,000,000 listeners tune in. (Even Washington Post will admit it's a minimum of 20,000,000 - google it). WIBC couldn't survive without him, and the additional conservative talk isn't on a whim. Research dictates it.
And a 19% unfavorable rating for Limbaugh is laughable considering over 30,000,000 listeners tune in. (Even Washington Post will admit it's a minimum of 20,000,000 - google it). WIBC couldn't survive without him, and the additional conservative talk isn't on a whim. Research dictates it.