Savage said:...is the current WNTP/WIBG night pattern actually 10,000 watts now (more or less, with phasing system allowances) or is it still at 6.5kw?
Yes, the currrent night pattern is a full 10,000 watts.
Savage said:...is the current WNTP/WIBG night pattern actually 10,000 watts now (more or less, with phasing system allowances) or is it still at 6.5kw?
Amen to that. I remember, when driving cross-country in 1985 when moving from Philly to Colorado Springs, beginning to hear 630 KHOW in Denver listenably when I got around Hays, KS. Not bad for 5KW!DG02816 said:The Midwest has some of the best ground conductivity in the country, New England and Long Island have some of the worst.
When I first arrived at 990 in Philly in 1981, WNOX was the only station that ever gave us occasional trouble at night. And, that was pretty rare. When WNYR signed on their 990 signal that became the major thorn in my flesh. Even today, they still cause some problems. Today, however, my biggest headache is CKGM in Montreal which regularly screws us over at night. I know that they have had a bad habit of not switching to their night pattern -- which supposedly protects us, Rochester, Knoxville, and Providence. But, even when they do think to change pattern, that protection is often a joke.Savage said:Until WNYR moved from 680 kHz to 990 kHz in 1979-80 I could listen to WNOX clearly in Rochester at night while visiting family here.... WNOX's 10kw pattern was considerably different from WIBG's (and was nondirectional during the day.)
rtetro said:Today, however, my biggest headache is CKGM in Montreal which regularly screws us over at night.
I have similar problems with CFOS on 560. When I call them about it they apologize nicely, blame a technical glitch, and stay good for a couple of weeks. Then it starts again. There is also a Canadian on 920 that, from what I have been told haven't operated on their night pattern for ages. They regularly create havoc with WCHR in Trenton.DaveWilliams said:This seemed to be a pretty common thing with the Canadians as I can also remember Sudbury on 1110 eating up WBT at night.
rtetro said:I have similar problems with CFOS on 560. When I call them about it they apologize nicely, blame a technical glitch, and stay good for a couple of weeks. Then it starts again. There is also a Canadian on 920 that, from what I have been told haven't operated on their night pattern for ages. They regularly create havoc with WCHR in Trenton.DaveWilliams said:This seemed to be a pretty common thing with the Canadians as I can also remember Sudbury on 1110 eating up WBT at night.
I remember in 1971 picking up WBBF toward sunset in Clarksburg,WV,where I have lived since the late 60's...I can recall Larry White playing "Mr. Bojangles" by the Nitty Gritty Dirt Band...And the reception of WIBG in Wayland was indeed rare.....The craziest West Virginia 950 DX I can remember occured in the Winter of 1978 at about 2 A.M...I got WLOF Orlando,Fla. loud and clear for about 20 minutes......I can also recall picking up WAXC overnights in WV in the mid 70's but it was a struggle. The dominant 1460 was usually WCMB, Harrisburg,Pa.Savage said:Greetings from one Philly/Rochester region hybrid to another. It's astonishing you could ever get WIBG in Wayland. As the original Big 99 (see rtetro's post) had to protect the entire Canadian border, very little power was radiated north - I seem to remember one monitor point near Ambler, PA, and IIRC the power radiated on that radial was less than 50 watts. Back in '69 when I was first on-air at WIBBAGE, my parents in Livonia, NY, tried to catch WIBG (my dad was quite the DXer) and could only read WILK 980.
You never should have been able to get WBBF in Wayland since one of the stations they protect is WPEN. Their 1kw, DA-2 is very tight on both patterns, sucked in deeply east-west daytime to protect 950 in Utica, NY and 930 in Buffalo, 70 miles away. At night it's a cardioid 3-tower inline aimed almost due north right over Rochester into Lake Ontario, with very little southern radiation. You must have been getting BBF in Chester by the round-the-earth route!
DaveWilliams said:This seemed to be a pretty common thing with the Canadians as I can also remember Sudbury on 1110 eating up WBT at night.
And Archie, whom I replaced upon his retirement, was correct in being a "perfectionist" with what amounted to a critical array - even though it was not licensed as such. It was a difficult array to keep wiitin parameters, so he was very adamant about knowing what the actual readings were. That being said, it was a pretty creative way to do it. When the format changed to religious programming in 1980 it was a much easier job to get the readings because there was a lot of silence in the talk programming. Eventually we replaced all of those thermocouple meters with Delta meters and installed a Delta antenna monitor and type approved sample system, which made things much more manageable.Savage said:Of course, simply "fudging" by guesstimating the accurate RF value was strictly "out" with the unionized shop and perfectionist Archie Sichel, WIBG's CE. So the solution was twice daily, six stopsets were scheduled with at least one record in between each one. Each stopset began with a PSA with "built-in dead air" - starting with something like, "in just THREE SECONDS - a message from your US Army Recruiter." Or "in just THREE SECONDS - a reminder about drunk driving." And so forth. During the pause, the engineer read the meter - and he had one record to get his butt to the next tower to read the next meter in line.