F
Froggy
Guest
And this is WHY the FCC is REVISITING Unattended Operations in their LOCALISM hearings.When 95% of your LOCAL BROADCAST HOURS on weekends are Voice Tracked...the issue of PUBLIC SAFETY is raised.
Paul_Warren said:One thing lost in the discussion of whether an event affects enough people to be worth coverage is the long-term promotional effect of that coverage.
If you're in a market of one million population, and you break format to cover something like a fire threatening 30 homes, it's a win in several ways...
(1) The coverage, even if regular listeners tune out, is better than any "WXXX care" promo or charity tie-in you could air. Actions speak so much louder than words. Every homeowner gets the subtle message that if his home is threatened in the next fire, you'll be there for him. (Of course, this only matters if you exploit the benefit by actually covering the next fire.)
Your a smart fellow and I agree with you 100%..Let's see WMEL do that! Big Ape!
(2) You have a chance to be of unique service to listeners, and to local emergency responders who need people to avoid the area or take alternate routes. You may even wind up with something useful in your public file.
(3) TV is interested only in stories which are visually compelling. Talking on-air with people losing their homes to the fire, or just having won the fight to save them, is poorly done with boring still graphics by TV, but can be very compelling in audio form on the radio.
(4) Believe it or not, many listeners find an out-of-control wildfire approaching the largest municipality in the county much more interesting that another spin of that Mariah Carey record. So do many broadcasters!
Paul... You hit it on the head........BIG APE said:Paul_Warren said:One thing lost in the discussion of whether an event affects enough people to be worth coverage is the long-term promotional effect of that coverage.
If you're in a market of one million population, and you break format to cover something like a fire threatening 30 homes, it's a win in several ways...
(1) The coverage, even if regular listeners tune out, is better than any "WXXX care" promo or charity tie-in you could air. Actions speak so much louder than words. Every homeowner gets the subtle message that if his home is threatened in the next fire, you'll be there for him. (Of course, this only matters if you exploit the benefit by actually covering the next fire.)
Your a smart fellow and I agree with you 100%..Let's see WMEL do that! Big Ape!
(2) You have a chance to be of unique service to listeners, and to local emergency responders who need people to avoid the area or take alternate routes. You may even wind up with something useful in your public file.
(3) TV is interested only in stories which are visually compelling. Talking on-air with people losing their homes to the fire, or just having won the fight to save them, is poorly done with boring still graphics by TV, but can be very compelling in audio form on the radio.
(4) Believe it or not, many listeners find an out-of-control wildfire approaching the largest municipality in the county much more interesting that another spin of that Mariah Carey record. So do many broadcasters!