Analog radio will NOT be going away anytime soon. There's hundreds of millions of receivers that would not work if it were to.I'd give it 20-25 years (on the FM side) if HD catches on. AM will probably forever be analog, unless they decided to just abandon the band altogether.jras20 said:Will Analog Am/Fm go away like Analog TV will in the next 2-3 years? I'm sure Radio will wait longer before they kill off all analog radio if that happens, but is it possible they will? Wonder how much longer analog scanners/weather radios etc. will still be working?
you obviously have no idea what you are talking about. every major electronics retailer in baton rouge la sells turntables. abd you can find a ton of new vinyl..see www.vvinyl.com www.tower.com and many many independant record stores around the country.there are hundreds of turntables still available today. as well as brand new tape decks. even balck and white tvs are still in production. hd is going nowhere. the only people athat even know about it is industry people.!!autopaint said:"Analog radio will NOT be going away anytime soon. There's hundreds of millions of receivers that would not work if it were to."While I won't state that IBOC will rid the world of standard analogue transmissions any time soon, think about the recording industry. There were at least as many record players as there are radios and today you'd be hard pressed to find a record shop selling current materal. Sure you can buy some upscale turntables and cartridges for sale but their numbers are minimal. Technology moves fast, and over the past 10 years I've replaced my computers numerous times and gone from dos to XP Pro and even XP is becoming yesterdays platform. The older computers can be used effectively as door stops in todays world. I'd say 25 years from now the world will be a completely different place and possibly analogue, as we know it, in any form will be seen as something from the past, as cylinder records are viewed today.
Having done A/B comparisons between LP records versus CDs and 1/2" reel-to-reel tapes, the LP records and 1/2" tapes sound better than CDs. While they do sound clear and crisp, CDs have a dry, sterile, "over-crisp" sound (similar to FM audio) that is lacking in richness and warmth. Neil Young commented that a CD re-release of one of their old LP albums "washed over him like a wave of ice cubes" as far as the audio quality was concerned.Another thing LP records have in their favor is the cover art, which just doesn't have the same visual impact on those tiny insert sheets inside the CD cases. A few years ago I was on a metro bus in Miami, and a teenage passenger was admiring the artwork on a new-release Hip-Hop LP album he had just bought. Even the C. Crane company has added a new Teac turntable/AM/FM tuner to their product line.Vinyl records will never replace CDs, but they will never go away any more than horses did after the automobile--they both have their niches. Today you can even still buy newly-made parts for old Edison *cylinder* phonographs and the old one-sided Edison "diamond disc" record players. -- Jasondbdigital said:Wow! I didn't realize that there is a vinyl revival going on. I knew that, for years, club DJ's had been getting new vinyl for their gigs but I didn't know that this is now spilling over into the home listener. Obviously a digital backlash. Glad to see it. I've always felt that with a good turntable and cartridge, LP's sounded way better than CD's. Sure, LP's are a little more hassle to play but they're worth it. And, of course, it's still the easiest audio format to cue up.db
Oh, lighten up! Besides, there's nothing new on the HD radio board anyway. The pros and cons of this defective technology laughingly referred to as HD radio have been discussed to death. At the end of the day, those who religiously love it, like yourself, are still going to love it and those who see it for what it is are still going to hate it.So lighten up.dbautopaint-1 said:Let's see, This is a radio board right? For a minute I thought this was a Absolute Sound message board. My home equipment consists of a Mac MA 6100, A Dennon DP 60L table with a Sumiko moving coil cartridge, Silver Litz headshell wiring, All high end interconnects, a MCI reel to reel, a Tascam DA40 dat machine, a Rotel CD player, What was the top of the line Sony cassette recorder (3 heads, 4 motor, Dolby s and more) Monster cable speaker wiring, Infinity reference standard 2 speakers (Floor standing with 7 elements in each enclosure) as well as a high end tuner and a 78 RPM turntable. My collection goes back to brown wax cylinders with machines to play them as well. I've heard all the arguments. In the end vinyl is dead and CD's (for the moment) rule the industry. With the advent of IPODs and other digital player, MP3's/AAC are taking over. That's the world we live in.We aren't talking niche programing. We are talking about a technolgical revolution. This is the IBOC board. By the way, I own a Columbioa BK and a Edison B Home (with four minute adapter) and a Victrola 14. They all work and are in excellent condition. I'll bet we can count the number of people who listen to antique phonographs within 25 miles of me on one hand. You don't hold technology back because a few people enjoy cranking their cars by hand.
I don't know if I'd pass such a harsh judgement against 8-track tapes. They always sounded as good as cassettes to me (although 1/2" reel-to-reel tapes have a more "full-bodied" sound). My main complaint against them was the random nature of song access, where you would jump into the middle of another song when changing tracks.Speaking of FM, from what I've read and been told by "old timers," Major Armstrong's original 48 MHz - 50 MHz FM system sounded much better than today's FM equipment. I'm sure that part of it was due to the fact that it was all tube equipment on both ends of the signal (tube radios have a warm, rich sound), but he also took great care to optimize each stage in the audio chain from source to transmitter. He demonstrated things such as broadcasting dead silence (try *that* with AM!) and faithfully reproducing sounds such as "fizzing" carbonated water being poured in front of the studio microphone. When TV vacates the VHF band, maybe a few audiophiles/radio enthusiasts can set up Part 5 experimental high-fidelity analog FM stations in the old 48 MHz - 50 MHz FM band...we could listen on our analog TV sets. -- Jasonsmashedcd said:prosessed fm and even xm remind me of one thing..8 track tapes! fm never sounded worse than it does now. the processing makes it sound like crap. and the only reason i like xm is content. if it was the same lame programming thats on most clear channel stations i would drop it in a heartbeat! my record collection sounds great to me. even my cassette tapes sound better than all this digital stuff! oh well i guess i will stay in 1978. radio was better than anyway ;D
That had to be a wonderful event. I would have loved to have been there. I wonder if the old 40 Mc band could ever be resurrected for broadcast use? Maybe that would be an appropriate place for community broadcasting, LPFM, etc. I'm not sure how much public service radio is still using those frequencies. In most areas, it has all moved to VHF or usually UHF trunked systems, but the band may still be pretty busy in parts of the country. When the TV stations turn in their old channels, possibly some public service radio will be allowed move into those unused frequencies, clearing out the lower band. Of course, Congress wants the FCC to auction it all off to the highest bidder, so that may be realistic. If it could be worked out, it would be an appropriate tribute to Major Armstrong to bring broadcasting back to those frequencies.autopaint said:WA2XMN is ocassionally on the air with an experimental license for 42.8 Mhz Or MC if you prefer. http://www.wa2xmn.ar88.net/The Armstrong 50th event was fantastic for those of us who were at the event. If I had the opportunity on this site I'd post some pictures from that day.