kenrayc said:
I read that channels 2,3,and 4 will be used for cell phone service, as for 5 and 6 it would be nice if there used for FM radio,it needs to be expanded much like AM added 1610-1710.
At the current time the official position is that channels 2-6 will remain in TV service. A few dozen full-power stations in markets as large as Philadelphia, Nashville, Memphis, and Albany have been assigned channels in this zone for their permanent DTV operations. It is way too late to move them to different channels against their will - they've invested too much money in VHF transmitting gear, and there's no way they could make the February deadline if they were forced to move to new channels. (three of the four abovementioned stations cannot remain on their interim channels as they're all above 51) There are also a fair number of LPTV and translator stations authorized for digital operation in these channels. And the analog ones that have been there for years are not yet required to convert to digital. (even when they are required to convert, many will convert in-place, on their existing channels)
IMHO channels 2-6 are not suitable for cellphone service. A reasonably efficient antenna would be way too large; alternatively, an antenna that would reasonably fit on a phone would be horribly inefficient. An antenna of roughly the same efficiency as those on current cellphones would be roughly three feet (?!) long. (for channel 6. For channel 2 that figure would approach **five feet**.)
Plus, all the noise and skip that make those channels undesirable for digital TV also make them undesirable for other services. There's a reason the other services didn't complain when broadcasters asked the FCC to allow the continued use of channels 2-6 for TV: no other service
wants channels 2-6!
I do think there would be a point to offering the use of all five channels for FM radio
on a secondary basis to TV. Here in Nashville there will be a DTV station on channel 5, but none elsewhere in 2-6. So all of channels 2, 3, and 4, and the upper 2/3 of channel 6 could be used for FM. Skip interference would be a significant problem, and it would take decades to get enough radios into the hands of listeners to make the new frequencies competitive. But it could be done.
The NAB will never permit it. They engineered IBOC/HD Radio when a technically-superior technology already existed; the only reason for developing a new system was to prevent the development of new full-coverage full-fidelity competitive signals. Expanding the FM band would do the same thing and would never pass lobbyist muster.