I don't think you're giving B.J. enough credit. His has a pretty good talk show in its own right. Is Stern better ... sure, but B.J. is local and his show is not a complete clone of Sterns' show either. B.J. has been influenced at least as much by Tom Leykis as Stern -- he is even doing a Friday quick rundown of clips earlier in the week. His show is much more topical than Sterns'. The lack of "talent" on B.J.'s show is some of the appeal of listening. He knows what he is doing -- the show becomes spontaneous and piques one's attention. In that regard he has taken a lot from Stern.Rivers is the radio answer to the Jay Leno Show. His is a conservative, predictable show that will get ratings. Even listeners who are not regular fans will listen now and then. Advertisers will forever love him.A challenge for Stern is that his show needs to hold more of a national appeal. It still sounds like it is for East Coast audiences primarily, and the listener spends time listening to how good of a time he and his crew are having. Well, I am happy for them, but I could not care less. If he airs on conventional radio, one reason may well be that he is not that great, in spite of what he says about himself.I honestly believe him when he does say he is happy to be off terrestrial radio. Howard does seem to be enjoying himself, and considering his contract how could he possibly consider changing back until 2011 at the earliest? It would surprise the hell out of me if he had a dual broadcasting arrangement, considering that he brags about the exclusivity of content on Sirius.