Also, I don't want to hear sports on a music station. That is what AM is for.
clemsonbloke said:So many stations ask for input but none have ever listened to me so I'm pretty burnt on upstate radio, I wish it were different.
carolinaradio said:Getting (somewhat) back to the main topic, how long do you all think MY will stick around? They are clearly on a downward trend that I don't see them recovering from. All Christmas on the Hot AC format certainly didn't help for the second year in a row. Lots of ego put in to that change to "fresh." I think it'll be gone in 6 months or so. I try to listen sometimes but it gets a little stale and boring after while.
clemsonbloke said:Mumford and Sons belongs on a country station. Rockers aren't into that banjo crap.![]()
clemsonbloke said:Mumford and Sons belongs on a country station. Rockers aren't into that banjo crap.![]()
clemsonbloke said:There is real rock out there but no one will play it.
Well (trying to be as un-biased as I can be, as I despise Mumford), I don't have a problem with "Alternative" stations playing them, but if they say they play "Alternative ROCK", it's a bit of a stretch IMO. I completely agree that it doesn't have to be thrashing/loud to be rock, but M&S just seems to be pushing it if you say you play Alternative rock. There is nothing rock about Mumford & Sons, IMO - it sounds like straight folk/bluegrass (FWIW, Wikipedia says it's Indie Folk and Country Folk). I personally consider something like "Home" by Phillip Phillips, which had somewhat of a folk influence, to be more Alternative friendly (had it not gone to CHR first) than "I Will Wait." I have a little trouble considering M&S to really be rock in much of a way.awp69 said:I kind of disagree with this. Mumford & Sons even prior to breaking out further with their latest album are IMO more of a bluegrass/rock hybrid. I don't see anything wrong with the fact that country stations now play them. But Alternative has always had a history of playing some "alternative country"' as you may call it with bands like Wilco and Son Volt as well as some folksier stuff like the new Family of the Year song. Heck, even 10,000 Maniacs was pretty big in the late '80s on alternative stations. Maybe straight rock stations shouldn't be playing it, but Alternative is just that - alternative music (that may or may not have electric guitars). Some may even argue whether some of the Dave Matthews Band's songs are "rock".
I do agree that maybe the crunchier songs of late including Mumford & Sons, Of Monsters & Men and The Lumineers may be a temporary "fad". I'm not exactly excited that all of these bands have crossed over to CHR, but they all were "alternative" at the time they first were released and may never have been found if it weren't for alt stations.
Adult-leaning CHR actually isn't that different from CHR anymore. I'd say the main difference still is that Adult CHR is faster on alternative/pop rock crossovers (like Channel 96.1, but that station is in a larger market which is more open to truly new stuff), has a lower spin rate, and plays more gold Hot AC'ish tracks from the past few years, but that's about it. Adult CHR used to mean no rap/hip hop and an embracement of rock/pop rock/alt, but since we've seen that embraced and hip hop mostly gone on nearly every CHR, the differences aren't that major anymore.awp69 said:I definately see a change by the end of the year. And I'll reiterate my suggestion of a adult-leaning CHR. Yes, that's almost Hot AC, but if they completely reimage themselves and really keep up with new music and go straight CHR with a little more on the pop-rock side instead of more rhythmic, I think they have a shot at taking down B93.7. Of course, management may feel it's necessary to go in a completely new direction.
I know it was alternative and a lot of people don't like all the crossover that's gone on, but B93.7 is still pretty slow at picking up on pop-rock crossovers like the aformentioned Mumford & Sons and Of Monsters & Men. Channel 96.1 picks up new music on that side of the CHR spectrum much more quickly. And Hot 98.1, which has its own problemms, already covers the entire spectrum of rhythmic on the urban side.
carolinaradio said:Well (trying to be as un-biased as I can be, as I despise Mumford), I don't have a problem with "Alternative" stations playing them, but if they say they play "Alternative ROCK", it's a bit of a stretch IMO. I completely agree that it doesn't have to be thrashing/loud to be rock, but M&S just seems to be pushing it if you say you play Alternative rock. There is nothing rock about Mumford & Sons, IMO - it sounds like straight folk/bluegrass (FWIW, Wikipedia says it's Indie Folk and Country Folk). I personally consider something like "Home" by Phillip Phillips, which had somewhat of a folk influence, to be more Alternative friendly (had it not gone to CHR first) than "I Will Wait." I have a little trouble considering M&S to really be rock in much of a way.awp69 said:I kind of disagree with this. Mumford & Sons even prior to breaking out further with their latest album are IMO more of a bluegrass/rock hybrid. I don't see anything wrong with the fact that country stations now play them. But Alternative has always had a history of playing some "alternative country"' as you may call it with bands like Wilco and Son Volt as well as some folksier stuff like the new Family of the Year song. Heck, even 10,000 Maniacs was pretty big in the late '80s on alternative stations. Maybe straight rock stations shouldn't be playing it, but Alternative is just that - alternative music (that may or may not have electric guitars). Some may even argue whether some of the Dave Matthews Band's songs are "rock".
I do agree that maybe the crunchier songs of late including Mumford & Sons, Of Monsters & Men and The Lumineers may be a temporary "fad". I'm not exactly excited that all of these bands have crossed over to CHR, but they all were "alternative" at the time they first were released and may never have been found if it weren't for alt stations.
"Little Talks" is a little more difficult to classify. It doesn't really fit anywhere other than Alternative. I don't have a problem with it on Alternative. "Madness" might do well for the format, as another dubstep track did ("Too Close" by Alex Clare, surprisingly, which I could almost consider a techno/dance track)....but I just wonder how these stations can get away with calling themselves Alternative ROCK. Alternative, yes, but not sure about the rock part in some cases. Stations like X-98.5 call themselves the new "rock" alternative...given some of the material on the chart right now, it might be smart not to use the word "rock." JMO
All of that said, I hope this folksy/"crunchy" stuff is just a fad. I'm not a fan of it at all. Mumford & Sons is one of the most interesting crossovers to CHR yet.