>>ClearChannel, Entercom and a few more companies have announced the HD-2 will be commercial free for at least 18 months. After that, who knows? The truth is that it will cost us very little to run at first. Once the radios are (or aren't) there, we'll take a look at how to sell it.<<
>>Reality here...with all due respect to these fine broadcasting companies, it's difficult enough to sell advertising on stations with with listeners. Do you really expect advertisers to spend money on a system with no listeners? First off, nobody, and I am not talking about radio people, nobody has ever heard of HD2, yet wants to buy a receiver. Look how long it's taken satellite radio to get a foothold. 18 months? Unless the spots are bonused away, which I think will happen, it will take a very long time to sell cash spots. So far, from what I've heard of the New York stations' HD2 service, no effort is being put into programming them. They are simply jukeboxes. No way to woo listeners. Then again, I could be wrong. We'll see.<<
You need to think bigger here. HD is very much in it's infancy. This isn't about right now...it's about the future. Because HD-2 costs so little as a jukebox, there is no rush to make money. It's like an investment...spend the money now to be in a better position later. You aren't telling us anything new - we know nobody is listening yet. Nobody was listening to analog FM in 1968, either. I'd say it's done well for itself.
Who knows...it may not be spots that produce the revenue. It could be on-display advertising, or any number of things. There are several ways to do it.
We don't know even know how we're going to do it yet, and you already are predicting that things will be difficult. You're kind of a "glass-is-half-full" kind of guy, aren't you?

<P ID="signature">______________
</P>