• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WJMK or WCBS coming back?

F

FU2CCU

Guest
Why are they continuing to employ Charlie Lake and all of the WJMK jocks? Don't tell me it's just for the www.wjmk.com audio stream.

Isn't something similar going on with WCBS?

Here's my prediction.....one of those stations will come back on another frequency! All of this free publicity for both the OLD and NEW station...then a statement like "the public has spoken and we have to listen to them....."

Stay tuned!
 
Nope -- this is a lead in to HD radio.

Many side frequencies, numerous formats.

At least, that's my thought on it.
 
> Nope -- this is a lead in to HD radio.
>
> Many side frequencies, numerous formats.
>
> At least, that's my thought on it.
>
I agree with the HD radio. What would be the point of switching formats, only to bring it back to another frequency.
 
> What would be the point of
> switching formats, only to bring it back to another
> frequency.
NextMedia sold WJTW and brought the format back on WLLI (now WSSR). I know, pointless.
 
> > Nope -- this is a lead in to HD radio.
> >
> > Many side frequencies, numerous formats.
> >
> > At least, that's my thought on it.
> >
> I agree with the HD radio. What would be the point of
> switching formats, only to bring it back to another
> frequency.
>
But HD is so far away from the general listening public....is it really worth all that money in staff just to put something on? It will take 5-10 years before HD takes off....isn't the point to save money or make more?
 
> Here's my prediction.....one of those stations will come
> back on another frequency! All of this free publicity for
> both the OLD and NEW station...then a statement like "the
> public has spoken and we have to listen to them....."


**************************************************************


Radio should know that once you lose a listener, it's hard to get them back. People listen to the radio out of habit. Once that habit is broken, listeners find other sources for their music. Real Oldies WRLL is a great station. But THEY are having trouble attracting listeners because music from that era had been missing from radio for too long.
 
> > > Nope -- this is a lead in to HD radio.
> > >
> > > Many side frequencies, numerous formats.
> > >
> > > At least, that's my thought on it.
> > >
> > I agree with the HD radio. What would be the point of
> > switching formats, only to bring it back to another
> > frequency.
> >
> But HD is so far away from the general listening
> public....is it really worth all that money in staff just to
> put something on? It will take 5-10 years before HD takes
> off....isn't the point to save money or make more?

Satellite will kill iBiquity's HD Radio in that amount of time.


Oops! Too late -- It already has.
 
> Why are they continuing to employ Charlie Lake and all of
> the WJMK jocks? Don't tell me it's just for the
> www.wjmk.com audio stream.
>
> Isn't something similar going on with WCBS?

From what I have read, a similar thing is not happening with WCBS. The CBS-FM jocks and PD have all been let go, and at least one former jock (Cousin Brucie) has spoken publicly about the format change. None of the WJMK jocks have said a word to the media.
 
> > > > Nope -- this is a lead in to HD radio.
> > > >
> > > > Many side frequencies, numerous formats.
> > > >
> > > > At least, that's my thought on it.
> > > >
> > > I agree with the HD radio. What would be the point of
> > > switching formats, only to bring it back to another
> > > frequency.
> > >
> > But HD is so far away from the general listening
> > public....is it really worth all that money in staff just
> to
> > put something on? It will take 5-10 years before HD takes
>
> > off....isn't the point to save money or make more?
>
> Satellite will kill iBiquity's HD Radio in that amount of
> time.
>
>
> Oops! Too late -- It already has.
>

Satellite radio has its place especially for nitch formats. Local radio, providing it's programmed correctly will always win out since it connects better with listeners where they live.

WJMK was successful because of the personalities not just the music alone. HD radio will provide greater possibilities in programming choices providing the corporations let it happen.

The real issue with diversity in programming is an issue with media monopolies brought about be deregulation over the last 20 years. This needs to be reversed to allow for a greater mix in ownership so the same brain isn't making all the programming decisions.
 
> [Satellite radio has its place, especially for nitch formats.]


It looks like commercial radio is saying that most music formats are now "nitch" formats.
 
> > [Satellite radio has its place, especially for nitch
> formats.]
>
>
> It looks like commercial radio is saying that most music
> formats are now "nitch" formats.
>

Terrestrial radio is advertiser supported, while satellite radio is listener supported. If a format does not get advertiser support, like oldies, standards, etc., it will only be appropriate for satellite.
 
> > Here's my prediction.....one of those stations will come
> > back on another frequency! All of this free publicity for
>
> > both the OLD and NEW station...then a statement like "the
> > public has spoken and we have to listen to them....."
>
>
**> ************************************************************
>
>
>
> Radio should know that once you lose a listener, it's hard
> to get them back.

What was the sample size and methodology of the project taht you did to determine this? Or is it just your opinion?

> People listen to the radio out of habit.
> Once that habit is broken, listeners find other sources for
> their music. Real Oldies WRLL is a great station. But THEY
> are having trouble attracting listeners because music from
> that era had been missing from radio for too long.
>

The issue is that the age of listener that format attracts is relatively unattractive to advertisers and not likely to be programmed in many places.

WRLL's greatest problem is it an X-bander, where over half the radios in America do not go,a nd has inadequate power and, reason #1, it is an AM playing music.
 
> [Radio should know that once you lose a listener, it's hard to get them back.]
>
> [What was the sample size and methodology of the project taht
> you did to determine this? Or is it just your opinion?]


You're in the business. Tell us how many people listen to commercial music radio today compared to 10 years ago.
 
> > [Radio should know that once you lose a listener, it's
> hard to get them back.]
> >
> > [What was the sample size and methodology of the project
> taht
> > you did to determine this? Or is it just your opinion?]
>
>
> You're in the business. Tell us how many people listen to
> commercial music radio today compared to 10 years ago.

The total cume for radio has not varied more than a few thenths of a percent from the 70's. It is currently at between 94% and 96% of all persons, depending on the market.
 
After PBS using 60s and 70s music programs during fund drive weeks, do you think oldies could work as "listener supported" in non-com radio?


> Terrestrial radio is advertiser supported, while satellite
> radio is listener supported. If a format does not get
> advertiser support, like oldies, standards, etc., it will
> only be appropriate for satellite.
 
> > You're in the business. Tell us how many people listen to
>
> > commercial music radio today compared to 10 years ago.
>
> The total cume for radio has not varied more than a few
> thenths of a percent from the 70's. It is currently at
> between 94% and 96% of all persons, depending on the market.


*************************************************************


I think that you are dancing with us, David. Remember, we are (former) listeners, NOT advertisers. The original thread pertained to former Oldies listeners coming back to Oldies radio sometime in the future. My post referred specifically to the drop in commercial MUSIC radio listeners in the last 10 years.
 
> NextMedia sold WJTW and brought the format back on WLLI (now
> WSSR). I know, pointless.
>

The point WAS that NextMedia could sell the station for a ton of money, buy other stations and re-install the "star" format elsewhere.

Other stations were purchased (WCCQ, WWYW). The only flaw in the plan was that the format was not re-installed immediately and is not being done the way it was on 93-5.

Why, I don't know that.
 
> >
> > The total cume for radio has not varied more than a few
> > thenths of a percent from the 70's. It is currently at
> > between 94% and 96% of all persons, depending on the
> market.
>
>
*> ************************************************************
>
>
>
> I think that you are dancing with us, David. Remember, we
> are (former) listeners, NOT advertisers. The original
> thread pertained to former Oldies listeners coming back to
> Oldies radio sometime in the future. My post referred
> specifically to the drop in commercial MUSIC radio listeners
> in the last 10 years.

Correct. The reach of radio, whether by format or in general has not changed in the last 10 years. There are differences based on formats... if you go back further in time, a leading music format was "eautiful music"... but the number of total listeners (as a percentage of th epopulation) has not varied from year to year, from decade to decade, or from the late 60's to today.

There are always some people who don't listen, and some who listen lightly. But, remember, nearly no one listend just to CBS-FM. Or, for that matter, to any oldies staiton anywhere. the average Arbitron diary has three different staitons in it... so when an oldies staiton is lost and not replaced, the normal, non-whiney listener just uses the other choices more.

When NY lost country, usage of radio did not decline. The people who liked country just settled on thier other choices. Today, radio usage will NOT decline. It will just redistribute itself. There are only a small handful of folks as passionate about oldies as you are, and, statistically, you don't count. Thanks for playing.
 
> > >
> > > The total cume for radio has not varied more than a few
> > > thenths of a percent from the 70's. It is currently at
> > > between 94% and 96% of all persons, depending on the
> > market.
> >
> >
> *>
> ************************************************************
>
> >
> >
> >
> > I think that you are dancing with us, David. Remember, we
>
> > are (former) listeners, NOT advertisers. The original
> > thread pertained to former Oldies listeners coming back to
>
> > Oldies radio sometime in the future. My post referred
> > specifically to the drop in commercial MUSIC radio
> listeners
> > in the last 10 years.
>
> Correct. The reach of radio, whether by format or in general
> has not changed in the last 10 years. There are differences
> based on formats... if you go back further in time, a
> leading music format was "eautiful music"... but the number
> of total listeners (as a percentage of th epopulation) has
> not varied from year to year, from decade to decade, or from
> the late 60's to today.
>
> There are always some people who don't listen, and some who
> listen lightly. But, remember, nearly no one listend just to
> CBS-FM. Or, for that matter, to any oldies staiton anywhere.
> the average Arbitron diary has three different staitons in
> it... so when an oldies staiton is lost and not replaced,
> the normal, non-whiney listener just uses the other choices
> more.
>
> When NY lost country, usage of radio did not decline. The
> people who liked country just settled on thier other
> choices. Today, radio usage will NOT decline. It will just
> redistribute itself. There are only a small handful of folks
> as passionate about oldies as you are, and, statistically,
> you don't count. Thanks for playing.
>

***Stands and applauds***
Amen. Oldies aficianados better go burn their 45s to CD...cause Classic Rock is the new oldies. I read the posts here from the 'outraged' minority.
Doo-wop? Been dead since the Beatles hit. The people that lament the death of CBS-FM and WJMK are the same people that were crying about the Oldies shift to 60's and 70's. Well, guess what, kids. The "Real Oldies" Oldies geeks often refer to as the heart of the 'true' Oldies format aren't relevant, or in many cases, even recognizable to anyone under, say....50. Think McDonalds gives a damn about selling senior citizens coffee and playing bingo? Nice extra income, but Happy Meals are their guarantee for future earnings. Same with radio. Gotta go where the money and the interest lies. How many people burn CD's and listen to I-pods with elevator music (sorry, Beautiful Music) on them? Didn't think so.

Is there an audience for the Oldies Format still? Yes. Is there money to be made in the format? Again, yes. Is Lawrence Welk still viable and profitable to his company, and to the PBS stations airing the show? Yes. Is there enough interest to sustain the show in the competitive marketplace? Not a chance. Just Like Welk's EZ listening music, Oldies is fading away. You can fight it, but it'll still happen. And the fact that you still buy things doesn't matter to radio advertisers. Why not? Cause you'll buy what you want, without regard to advertising...just like you listen to what you like (songs from 30, 40, and 50 years ago) without regard to current trends.

The 'average' listener (not the 50 people that grumble on these boards) will, as David so aptly pointed out, eventually find another station to listen to. No one outside the business particularly cares. Formats come and go. Radio will go on. David is right.

(Former) Oldies listeners will continue to listen...just not to Oldies. They won't come back to Oldies....cause Oldies isn't going to be an option.
 
> (Former) Oldies listeners will continue to listen...just not
> to Oldies. They won't come back to Oldies....cause Oldies
> isn't going to be an option.
>

You must of missed class that day this was taught. As people age they are set in their ways. Can't teach an old dog new tricks. It is a stat and shows in the research. Advertisers also need this. Older people int he majority will not listen to newer or different music as they age. Period.

Also some of you MISS a major point. It is not the dismissal of the 54+ traditional oldies listener. The question is, there is no where for the mid 40's female to go to listen to Top 40 music from her heyday.

Furthermore on a tangent, a lot have their heads in the sand and think the research is gospel. Radio listenership not going down? LOL, the new generation is busy listening to radio? Maybe as involunatary background noise. Thank computers, ipods, internet, P2P programs, satellite etc....... When the older gen is dying off, someone will have to replace them and it will not be the younger gen. <P ID="signature">______________

"Z"
Music Coordinator/Technical Support</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom