Re: SOJO....ouch!!!//Well, maybe.
> > I'm not saying that SoJo is doing well (I have no basis on
>
> > which to make such a statement) but Philly 12+ ratings and
>
> > Atlantic City 12+ ratings do not tell the story of SoJo's
> > success or failure. In fact, no 12+ numbers could. They
> > seem to be concentrating on a very distinct demographic
> > group and in a very distinct geographic region
> (Burlington,
> > Camden, and Gloucester Counties come to mind).
>
> Those three counties make up about 1/4 of the Philadelphia
> market. There's no way a station could be doing well in
> those counties and not get at least a 0.4 rating, which is
> the cutoff to be listed in R&R right now. For comparison,
> look at NJ 101.5, which DOES get big ratings 25-54 in those
> counties, and always shows up in the Philly ratings.
>
> It's sort of like the Mix 95.7 situation, where people would
> say "well you can't judge the station on 12+". Well, you
> could, because, statistically, a station getting a 1 share
> 12+ can't be dominating in 25-54.
>
> Sojo could be doing well in a small portion of the counties
> you mentioned, but it's not anywhere near reaching the full
> potential of that signal. I can't imagine Millennium is
> happy with it.
>
I hear what you're saying but I maintain that Millennium is trying something that we are just not able to judge. Like I said, the experiment may well be failing but I just don't believe that the numbers available to us will ever tell the story. Even if we had dayparts, demo breakdowns, etc. it might not be enough because I believe they are strongly targetting certain geographic areas.
If their experiment is failing, I wonder what format they could go with next? In conjunction with a good format, the signal could make the frequency a real player in both Philly and AC/Cape May.