NHRadio said:
Dan, why are there different rules for Class IV (sorry, Class C) stations? Is it that the C's are usually "graveyarders"? Is there an efficiency rule for A's as well?
When the Class IV class was created (sometime in the early '30s, I think) it was supposed to be for stations in small communities that served those communities and not much more. The power levels were 100W and 250W, which, over the years, were increased to 1 kW. As with today's Class D AMs, Class IVs received no nighttime protection. The low minimum antenna efficiency allowed the use of shorter, and hence less expensive antennas, which were thought consistent with the smaller revenues such stations would generate.
Of course, some of the oldest Class IV stations wound up in the largest cities. Chicago had three that shared time on one channel. Such stations could not cover their entire communities of license at least at night, but that was unimportant because they were not required to do so. Then in the 80s, the Rio treaty required nighttime coverage of at least 80% of the CoL. The suddenly inadequate nighttime coverage of nearly all Class C AMs was thus grandfathered, but when a Class C wants to make any change in its operation, the FCC usually gives them a ration of you know what and generally holds up granting of a CP, sometimes for years. The Chicago three-way time-share arrangement existed until only recently, although the FCC allowed the station that acquired the other two (WSBC) to retain the facilities it had used for decades. Another major market Class C is in Los Angeles--geographically one of the largest cities in the US. It took years and years for that station, KYPA, to move from its rooftop L antenna to a diplex with a higher-power co-owned station. WWRL in New York City was a Class IV until shortly after World War II but it was licensed to Woodside, a neighborhood in Queens, which is one of New York's five boroughs.
As for Class A AMs, at least in the US, the minimum efficiency is 362 mV/m/kW @ 1 km. Using a conventional antenna, this efficiency requires a tower almost 1/2 wavelength high. Because of FAA restrictions, Class A stations at the lower (longer-wavelength) end of the AM dial can receive waivers of the 362 mV/m requirement if achieving 362 mV/m would require a tower or towers taller than 500'. Several Class A stations at higher frequencies also have received waivers; two of them are KGO and WBBR. KNBR which is in the glide path of San Francisco International Airport, uses a sectionalized tower that was supposed to achieve the required efficiency with a tower of less than 500'. I've heard that the proof of performance did not support the intended efficiency and that the data was then somehow lost. I have no proof of that but it is interesting that, officially, KNBR's efficiency is exactly the Class A minimum.
Since sometime on the '80s, US Class A AMs have been required to run 50 kW-U. One US Class A, KNZR, is grandfathered at lower power (25 kW-D/10 kW-N). KOA cannot officially run 50 kW at night because allocations on 850 are based on KOA using an antenna of exactly the minimum Class A efficiency and KOA's 200+-degree tower is too efficient. The problem could be solved, of course, by slightly reducing the transmitter power, but that would violate the requirement to run 50 kW-U. So KOA--allegedly at least--uses a resistor to waste ~10 kW of its transmitter output. Now that's only about seven toasters' worth, but in these days of energy conservation it still seems like a waste.