This is still shown as the old WCRW tower in an old geographical database. Zoom way in on the map, and you'll see one tower labelled WCRW. It's on an old DWEDC record.
This is still shown as the old WCRW tower in an old geographical database. Zoom way in on the map, and you'll see one tower labelled WCRW. It's on an old DWEDC record.
Looks like they consolidated two of them at the Milwaukee Ave. site when WCRW went from 250 watts to 1000 watts Day, possibly due to overlap with WJOB 1230 near the Lake. That may have been when the first 1240 site consolidation occurred.Did WCRW use the 5475 N. Milwaukee site? I thought they used the 2796 N. Pine Grove Avenue site on top of a hotel building before being absorbed by WSBC.
Remember, the usual insulated tower is one-half of a dipole. The other half is the ground. So if you have a half-wave tower, you should have half wave radials ("should" and not "must"). That means huge real estate for the guy wires of the tower, and huge land for a half-wave out every direction around the base. Expensive.According to JoeU the site was constructed in 2008 or 2009. The ground system should be in good shape. After 40 or more years in the Georgia clay if you dig into a radial sometimes all you see is "green dirt line" where the copper "rusted". To paraphrase Martha Stewart: A good ground system is a good thing for AM daytime signals.
If installed property: the 820 radials should be log enough for the higher frequency "1000 khz" shorter wavelength.Remember, the usual insulated tower is one-half of a dipole. The other half is the ground. So if you have a half-wave tower, you should have half wave radials ("should" and not "must"). That means huge real estate for the guy wires of the tower, and huge land for a half-wave out every direction around the base. Expensive.
I did some research some time back when digitizing some of the airchecks I made in Chicago. I lived in Chicago when WSBC bought WEDC and then began using the transmitter site. I was at 5600 North halfway between Clark and Broadway which turned out to be the perfect location for catching the handoffs - especially when WEDC jumped the gun and both stations had carrier at the same time. Conversely, if there was a gap between the two stations, WJOB could be easily detected.Did WCRW use the 5475 N. Milwaukee site? I thought they used the 2796 N. Pine Grove Avenue site on top of a hotel building before being absorbed by WSBC.
For historical reference, the WCRW site was at 2756 Pine Grove Avenue, just south of Diversey and between Clark/Broadway and Lakeview Avenue (very close to the Surf Hotel, later called the Willows). WCRW merged with WSBC in 1996. A public notice in the Chicago Tribune, indicating that WSBC was acquiring WCRW, was dated May 15, 1996. The public notice gave WCRW’s address as 5625 N. Milwaukee, so it’s possible that WCRW was using one of the other stations’ sites by then. The application was filed with the FCC on May 1, 1996. I wish I had known that when I was in Chicago later that month! The FCC did not get around to deleting the license until 2006, and had the 5625 address as the address of “WSBC Broadcasting”. By that time, WSBC had been sold to Newsweb Corporation (Fred Eychaner), which bought WSBC from Dan Lee for $5.5 million (see Broadcasting, November 10, 1997 via worldradiohistory.com). The FCC’s letter to the 5625 address seeking to understand the status of WCRW (um, wouldn’t they have known once the sale was consummated in 1996?) was returned to the sender.
You don't happen to have access to more complete details about the WAIT 4 tower 1 kW DA-N array in Elmhurst, than the bits and pieces we found and posted earlier in the thread, do you? If the picture is looking directly from a line perpendicular to the towers, since the towers are 153 degrees high, the spacing looks to be less, perhaps 120 degrees. A vectorially added 1:3:3:1 expansion could produce several nulls toward the WBAP 0.5 mV/m 50% skywave with varied phases around 60 degrees between each tower.Attached are the tower and radial exhibits from the original engineering application for the 820AM Joliet night site.
l see that happening more and more. From the ones I have heard about recently, "they made them an offer they couldn't refuse".I do not have anything on the old 820 Elmhurst site.
If I remember correctly, Century Broadcasting owned WAIT, WXEZ and WPNT 820 AM as well as FM 100. Strange that they spent money on putting up the additional 3 towers for the night signal at the Elmhurst site around 1985 only to sell it off in 1991.
At night in the WAIT days, you could drive by the towers on I-290 (they were next to the expressway on the north side) and still hear WBAP underneath.I do not have anything on the old 820 Elmhurst site.
Back in the WPNT simulcast days 1990ish, the night signal from Elmhurst was pretty weak traveling east from Downers Grove thru Hinsdale, Lagrange and into the south side of Chicago. WBAP was always on top. Traveling north past downtown Chicago, the 820 Elmhurst night signal was much better past Chicago Ave and through out much of Chicago's north side and probably into to close in north suburbs.
If I remember correctly, Century Broadcasting owned WAIT, WXEZ and WPNT 820 AM as well as FM 100. Strange that they spent money on putting up the additional 3 towers for the night signal at the Elmhurst site around 1985 only to sell it off in 1991.