• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WNDZ-750

why should they? the two plots between the current license and the proposed license don't seem that much difference. Their near field radiation will be higher, but who gives a damn about having a better signal in Hammond and Gary? Also it's a daytimer...who cares? Sign on in winter will be around 8am.
 
By boosting to 15,000 Watts with 3 towers(compared to 5kw/2 towers) WNDZ will actually have a better signal NW and N into more of CHICAGO and the suburbs...
 
PaulBWalkerJr said:
By boosting to 15,000 Watts with 3 towers(compared to 5kw/2 towers) WNDZ will actually have a better signal NW and N into more of CHICAGO and the suburbs...

Newsweb has yet to put up the 3rd tower up yet. I was riding with my Mom through Portage, while on my way to a family picnic in Westville. I could careless if the station upgrades their power. I don't listen to them. It's usually brokered ethnic programming that I can't understand.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom