stormy01 said:Oooh...WNUA-HD2 is stunting! What do all of you think they'll flip the format to? (;
It's playing some kind of old school soul right now, but it's still identifying itself as MEGA 95.5-2.stormy01 said:Oooh...WNUA-HD2 is stunting! What do all of you think they'll flip the format to? (;
Why is it that the anti-HD griefers can never just keep their mouths closed if they don't have anything to contribute? Do they just enjoy hearing themselves talk, or do they actually think they're cool?radioman148 said:All 50 people with HD radios will find out soon.
Reaperducer said:Why is it that the anti-HD griefers can never just keep their mouths closed if they don't have anything to contribute? Do they just enjoy hearing themselves talk, or do they actually think they're cool?radioman148 said:All 50 people with HD radios will find out soon.
radioman148 said:All 50 people with HD radios will find out soon.
clone said:radioman148 said:All 50 people with HD radios will find out soon.
Smooth Jazz at 2:10 AM...Rick Braun's "Night Walk"
The Decepticon(tm) probably rebooted and thought it was 1/1/00 again and defaulted to the Holiday music stream...
Reaperducer said:Hopefully this is the return of smooth jazz to Chicago.
BRNout said:Reaperducer said:Hopefully this is the return of smooth jazz to Chicago.
Huh? What about WLFM 87.7? They have a potential* audience of about 6 million with FM radios within range, while WNUA-HD2 has a potential audience of about 3,500 HD radio users within range (based on sales statistics and reception reports).
Not sure where you've been, but smooth jazz returned to Chicago the day after WNUA dumped it.
*potential audience = listeners who have the equipment and could theoretically listen to the station over the air.
I've been directly underneath WLFM's transmitter, which means I can't hear it at all. Not on my radio, and the signal that reaches my TV is unlistenable. 87.7 might be nice for out in a barn in the 'burbs, but in the heart of the city it's a non-entity.BRNout said:Reaperducer said:Hopefully this is the return of smooth jazz to Chicago.
Huh? What about WLFM 87.7? They have a potential* audience of about 6 million with FM radios within range, while WNUA-HD2 has a potential audience of about 3,500 HD radio users within range (based on sales statistics and reception reports).
Not sure where you've been,
Reaperducer said:I've been directly underneath WLFM's transmitter, which means I can't hear it at all. Not on my radio, and the signal that reaches my TV is unlistenable. 87.7 might be nice for out in a barn in the 'burbs, but in the heart of the city it's a non-entity.BRNout said:Reaperducer said:Hopefully this is the return of smooth jazz to Chicago.
Huh? What about WLFM 87.7? They have a potential* audience of about 6 million with FM radios within range, while WNUA-HD2 has a potential audience of about 3,500 HD radio users within range (based on sales statistics and reception reports).
Not sure where you've been,
BRNout said:Reaperducer said:I've been directly underneath WLFM's transmitter, which means I can't hear it at all. Not on my radio, and the signal that reaches my TV is unlistenable. 87.7 might be nice for out in a barn in the 'burbs, but in the heart of the city it's a non-entity.BRNout said:Reaperducer said:Hopefully this is the return of smooth jazz to Chicago.
Huh? What about WLFM 87.7? They have a potential* audience of about 6 million with FM radios within range, while WNUA-HD2 has a potential audience of about 3,500 HD radio users within range (based on sales statistics and reception reports).
Not sure where you've been,
News flash: there aren't many barns in places like Des Plaines!
Unless you live in one of those condos in the Hancock Tower, I think you need a new radio. It's been my experience that WLFM comes in pretty well around town. The signal breaks up a bit in my suburban area, though is still good enough to listen to in the car. It's FAR stronger than any dink HD-2 signal with it's 5 mile range and unlimited dropouts.
If you live downtown and are having trouble hearing WLFM, you might want to try and get a radio withReaperducer said:I've been directly underneath WLFM's transmitter, which means I can't hear it at all. Not on my radio, and the signal that reaches my TV is unlistenable. 87.7 might be nice for out in a barn in the 'burbs, but in the heart of the city it's a non-entity.BRNout said:Reaperducer said:Hopefully this is the return of smooth jazz to Chicago.
Huh? What about WLFM 87.7? They have a potential* audience of about 6 million with FM radios within range, while WNUA-HD2 has a potential audience of about 3,500 HD radio users within range (based on sales statistics and reception reports).
Not sure where you've been,