Re: You Mean The Courier-Express?
> It was a better environment when Buffalo had two separately
> owned newspapers as The Courier-Express competed with The
> Buffalo Evening News. Alas, those days have gone the way of
> the eight track tape.
We here in Rochester still mourn (bitterly, at that) the days when we had two newspapers which, even if commonly owned, had fully competitive news operations.
Even so, pick a day, any day, and grab copies of the News and the Democrat & Chronicle. There's simply no comparison. The News, even without the competition that the C-E provided, still captures far more of the flavor of Buffalo than the D&C does of Rochester. The News has more (and better) columnists, a far more comprehensive features section, a Sunday newshole that's probably half again as large as the Sunday D&C - about the only area where the D&C is reasonably competitive is sports, where some of the veterans are still hanging on.
And you guys have Pergament and Violanti. We have, um, "WNVE 95.1."
> Enjoy the texture of the newsprint now, because newspapers'
> days appear to be waning. Think the 12-24's are turning away
> from radio? What's happening to newspapers is even more
> pronounced. Pity, that.
Agreed - it's not a pretty picture. One can argue, though, that newspapers have brought it upon themselves. The D&C has essentially given up and walked away from the city where Gannett once proudly hung its corporate hat. It didn't have to be that way, and the community is immensely poorer for it. The News is trying, at least, and it has the immense advantage of answering to an owner interested only in the long-term picture, rather than a corporate owner interested only in the next quarter's bottom line.
I wonder if Buffett has ever considered launching a Rochester edition of the News? I'd subscribe in a heartbeat, if he did...<P ID="signature">______________
Tower Site Calendar 2006 JUST RELEASED! - <a target="_blank" href=http://www.fybush.com/nerw.html#calendar>www.fybush.com</a></P>