• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

World Radio Network

A previous thread regarding Canadian content included a few remarks (some of which I myself made) about World Radio Network.

World Radio Network (or WRN) is one of the gems of Sirius, in my opinion. It was one of the key reasons why I chose Sirius over XM; in fact, Sirius had a "leg up" over XM from "day one," in my book, when I found out Sirius would be carrying WRN.

Granted, my interest in WRN's content goes up and down like a yo-yo depending on the radio station, network or service whose programming WRN is rebroadcasting at the moment (and also on what is being offered by particular stations/networks at any given moment, of course). But, generally speaking, I like it. Radio Netherlands and Radio Australia are particularly good, in my opinion, and several others, including Radio Sweden, are of regular interest as well.

Incidentally, on its website, WRN describes itself as follows: "WRN's 24/7 English service for North America is a unique radio service that brings together programs from leading international public service broadcasters in Europe, Africa, Asia Pacific, North and Latin America. The network majors on news – national, regional and international and because the programs on WRN come directly from the source, our coverage is unrivalled. In addition to providing a comprehensive, non-US perspective on news and current affairs, WRN reports on science and the arts, economics and finance, sports and history – in fact the whole of life is reflected on WRN." (See http://www.wrn.org/listeners/stations/station.php?StationID=50)

The main flaws, as I see it, are sins of omission: Radio Japan and Radio France Internationale might be the biggest, and (despite the blurb quoted above) there are no stations from Latin America (although WRN might have found there are "slim pickings" where English-language Latin American programming is concerned), and I'm sure there are others -- Radio Taiwan International, for example. Also, the German station/network Deutsche Welle's programming is only run once a day starting at 10 AM Eastern time (Saturdays excepted, when Deutsche Welle can also be found in an afternoon timeslot), and Radio Canada International's programming is hidden away in the awful (IMHO) 4:30 AM time slot Monday through Friday, although those might be minor or second-tier programs, for all I know. (Public Radio International, or PRI, another Sirius stream, does air the worthwhile Canadian news show "As It Happens" in another timeslot, and I just noticed that PRI runs Deutsche Welle's "Newslink-Plus" at 9 PM Eastern. Seemingly missing in action, though, is the Canadian news show "World At Six," which I'd like to hear somewhere on Sirius.)

I see the worrisome possibility that China Radio International and Vatican Radio could be propagandists where news is concerned (cultural features could be another, happier story; by the way, I'm not sure how fair what I just said was where Vatican Radio and the news is concerned, but at least I'm admitting that's where my bias is) and I haven't always been all that interested in some of the eastern European broadcasters (I'm not talking about Voice of Russia, though -- I wish that were in an additional time slot, BTW), although that's my loss and I know it.

But these are nitpicks, and in my opinion, World Radio Network is a great idea, generally well-executed.

One other thing I like about World Radio Network is that it tends to run tiny generalist world news summaries from FSN (who???) in Washington right before the top of the hour.

I think that the proposed Canadian additions, particularly CBC Radio One (which runs "World At Six" -- at guess what time slot -- among other promising shows), would be good stations to have and would complement World Radio Network and Public Radio International (not to mention BBC World Service News) well. I hope Sirius adds them to its US service. But to sacrifice World Radio Network (the idea did come up in the earlier Canadian thread here) for Canadian content would be a big step backwards - a travesty, if you will. And getting rid of Public Radio International wouldn't be that great of an idea either.

By the way, as I prepared to send this post to the board, I Googled FSN, found the website and discovered that it's Feature Story News. Looks like a good news service, offhand. It also looks like WRN is only "scratching the surface" where FSN is concerned. (See http://www.featurestorynews.com/pages/3/index.htm and related pages, such as http://www.featurestorynews.com/pages/5/index.htm and http://www.featurestorynews.com/pages/8/index.htm)

Also by the way, while I'm on the subject of web links, here are links to some relevant WRN and PRI schedules:

http://www.wrn.org/listeners/schedules/schedule.php?ScheduleID=2

http://www.wrn.org/listeners/schedules/schedule.php?ScheduleID=2&Show=weekend

http://www.pri.org/publicsite/listeners/sirius_schedule.html
 
A couple more things - Re: World Radio Network

Before I logged out for the night, I checked WRN's website to see what stations might be offered to other parts of the world and made a couple of additional observations.

First, I see that WRN is offering the Ecuadorean evangelical Christian broadcaster HCJB, albeit in German, not English, and not on Sirius. (HCJB would certainly qualify as a Latin American broadcaster.)

Second, I notice that WRN is offering such Pacifica-type progressive programs as "Democracy Now" and "This Way Out" on WRN English For Europe and, in the case of "This Way Out," "WRN English for Africa/Middle East, WRN English for Asia Pacific."

That second point highlights a missed opportunity for Sirius. Besides offering those two shows, it could also have partnered with Pacifica Radio, or possibly Radio For Peace International. (Although, granted, liberal/progressive ideas are to be found on Sirius Left and also sometimes on Sirius OutQ.)

http://www.wrn.org/listeners/stations/index.php?CurrentLetter=1


> A previous thread regarding Canadian content included a few
> remarks (some of which I myself made) about World Radio
> Network.
>
> World Radio Network (or WRN) is one of the gems of Sirius,
> in my opinion. It was one of the key reasons why I chose
> Sirius over XM; in fact, Sirius had a "leg up" over XM from
> "day one," in my book, when I found out Sirius would be
> carrying WRN.
>
> Granted, my interest in WRN's content goes up and down like
> a yo-yo depending on the radio station, network or service
> whose programming WRN is rebroadcasting at the moment (and
> also on what is being offered by particular
> stations/networks at any given moment, of course). But,
> generally speaking, I like it. Radio Netherlands and Radio
> Australia are particularly good, in my opinion, and several
> others, including Radio Sweden, are of regular interest as
> well.
>
> Incidentally, on its website, WRN describes itself as
> follows: "WRN's 24/7 English service for North America is a
> unique radio service that brings together programs from
> leading international public service broadcasters in Europe,
> Africa, Asia Pacific, North and Latin America. The network
> majors on news – national, regional and international and
> because the programs on WRN come directly from the source,
> our coverage is unrivalled. In addition to providing a
> comprehensive, non-US perspective on news and current
> affairs, WRN reports on science and the arts, economics and
> finance, sports and history – in fact the whole of life is
> reflected on WRN." (See
htt> p://www.wrn.org/listeners/stations/station.php?StationID=50)
>
>
> The main flaws, as I see it, are sins of omission: Radio
> Japan and Radio France Internationale might be the biggest,
> and (despite the blurb quoted above) there are no stations
> from Latin America (although WRN might have found there are
> "slim pickings" where English-language Latin American
> programming is concerned), and I'm sure there are others --
> Radio Taiwan International, for example. Also, the German
> station/network Deutsche Welle's programming is only run
> once a day starting at 10 AM Eastern time (Saturdays
> excepted, when Deutsche Welle can also be found in an
> afternoon timeslot), and Radio Canada International's
> programming is hidden away in the awful (IMHO) 4:30 AM time
> slot Monday through Friday, although those might be minor or
> second-tier programs, for all I know. (Public Radio
> International, or PRI, another Sirius stream, does air the
> worthwhile Canadian news show "As It Happens" in another
> timeslot, and I just noticed that PRI runs Deutsche Welle's
> "Newslink-Plus" at 9 PM Eastern. Seemingly missing in
> action, though, is the Canadian news show "World At Six,"
> which I'd like to hear somewhere on Sirius.)
>
> I see the worrisome possibility that China Radio
> International and Vatican Radio could be propagandists where
> news is concerned (cultural features could be another,
> happier story; by the way, I'm not sure how fair what I just
> said was where Vatican Radio and the news is concerned, but
> at least I'm admitting that's where my bias is) and I
> haven't always been all that interested in some of the
> eastern European broadcasters (I'm not talking about Voice
> of Russia, though -- I wish that were in an additional time
> slot, BTW), although that's my loss and I know it.
>
> But these are nitpicks, and in my opinion, World Radio
> Network is a great idea, generally well-executed.
>
> One other thing I like about World Radio Network is that it
> tends to run tiny generalist world news summaries from FSN
> (who???) in Washington right before the top of the hour.
>
> I think that the proposed Canadian additions, particularly
> CBC Radio One (which runs "World At Six" -- at guess what
> time slot -- among other promising shows), would be good
> stations to have and would complement World Radio Network
> and Public Radio International (not to mention BBC World
> Service News) well. I hope Sirius adds them to its US
> service. But to sacrifice World Radio Network (the idea did
> come up in the earlier Canadian thread here) for Canadian
> content would be a big step backwards - a travesty, if you
> will. And getting rid of Public Radio International wouldn't
> be that great of an idea either.
>
> By the way, as I prepared to send this post to the board, I
> Googled FSN, found the website and discovered that it's
> Feature Story News. Looks like a good news service, offhand.
> It also looks like WRN is only "scratching the surface"
> where FSN is concerned. (See
> http://www.featurestorynews.com/pages/3/index.htm and
> related pages, such as
> http://www.featurestorynews.com/pages/5/index.htm and
> http://www.featurestorynews.com/pages/8/index.htm)
>
> Also by the way, while I'm on the subject of web links, here
> are links to some relevant WRN and PRI schedules:
>
http> ://www.wrn.org/listeners/schedules/schedule.php?ScheduleID=2
>
>
http://www.wrn.or> g/listeners/schedules/schedule.php?ScheduleID=2&Show=weekend
>
>
> http://www.pri.org/publicsite/listeners/sirius_schedule.html
>
 
WRN and other similar programming on satellite radio

> First, I see that WRN is offering the Ecuadorean evangelical
> Christian broadcaster HCJB, albeit in German, not English,
> and not on Sirius. (HCJB would certainly qualify as a Latin
> American broadcaster.)
>
> Second, I notice that WRN is offering such Pacifica-type
> progressive programs as "Democracy Now" and "This Way Out"
> on WRN English For Europe and, in the case of "This Way
> Out," "WRN English for Africa/Middle East, WRN English for
> Asia Pacific."
>
> That second point highlights a missed opportunity for
> Sirius. Besides offering those two shows, it could also have
> partnered with Pacifica Radio, or possibly Radio For Peace
> International. (Although, granted, liberal/progressive ideas
> are to be found on Sirius Left and also sometimes on Sirius
> OutQ.)
>

HCJB decided that English services targeting North America were not of strategic importance a couple years ago.

WRN may have distribution rights to Pacifica / RFPI type programming just for non-North American audiences (e.g. WorldSpace). I agree that satellite radio might a valid outlet for Pacifica to consider, though I don't listen to them personally. RFPI produces very little programming itself -- most of what they air comes from other producers. Keep in mind that RFPI is on a six-hour cycle -- only six hours of each 24 are new.

Cybelesown2, you might enjoy participating in an e-mail based discussion group regarding international broadcasting that I co-manage; its roots were shortwave programming but nowadays are "delivery method-agnostic". Sirius radio is often discussed.

More information on the list here: http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms

Contact me off-list at [email protected] if you'd like to discuss further -- I keep relatively plugged-in when it comes to internationally-focused spoken-word broadcasting.

Richard / Allentown, PA
 
Re: WRN and other similar programming on satellite radio

> > First, I see that WRN is offering the Ecuadorean
> evangelical
> > Christian broadcaster HCJB, albeit in German, not English,
>
> > and not on Sirius. (HCJB would certainly qualify as a
> Latin
> > American broadcaster.)
> >
> > Second, I notice that WRN is offering such Pacifica-type
> > progressive programs as "Democracy Now" and "This Way Out"
>
> > on WRN English For Europe and, in the case of "This Way
> > Out," "WRN English for Africa/Middle East, WRN English for
>
> > Asia Pacific."
> >
> > That second point highlights a missed opportunity for
> > Sirius. Besides offering those two shows, it could also
> have
> > partnered with Pacifica Radio, or possibly Radio For Peace
>
> > International. (Although, granted, liberal/progressive
> ideas
> > are to be found on Sirius Left and also sometimes on
> Sirius
> > OutQ.)
> >
>
> HCJB decided that English services targeting North America
> were not of strategic importance a couple years ago.
>
> WRN may have distribution rights to Pacifica / RFPI type
> programming just for non-North American audiences (e.g.
> WorldSpace). I agree that satellite radio might a valid
> outlet for Pacifica to consider, though I don't listen to
> them personally. RFPI produces very little programming
> itself -- most of what they air comes from other producers.
> Keep in mind that RFPI is on a six-hour cycle -- only six
> hours of each 24 are new.
>
> Cybelesown2, you might enjoy participating in an e-mail
> based discussion group regarding international broadcasting
> that I co-manage; its roots were shortwave programming but
> nowadays are "delivery method-agnostic". Sirius radio is
> often discussed.
>
> More information on the list here:
> http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
>
> Contact me off-list at [email protected] if you'd like to
> discuss further -- I keep relatively plugged-in when it
> comes to internationally-focused spoken-word broadcasting.
>
> Richard / Allentown, PA
>

Even though I have my trusty shortwave Grundig 350, I still enjoy WRN because it saves me the hassle of poring through my Passport to World Band Radio. If you like international shortwave broadcasting so much, I suggest getting a shortwave radio. *cough*Grundig 350*cough*
 
Re: WRN and other similar programming on satellite radio

>
>
> Even though I have my trusty shortwave Grundig 350, I still
> enjoy WRN because it saves me the hassle of poring through
> my Passport to World Band Radio. If you like international
> shortwave broadcasting so much, I suggest getting a
> shortwave radio. *cough*Grundig 350*cough*
>

Agreed -- I have a Sony '2010 that will be joining me on a DXPedition this weekend.

The Grundig 350 is a cute radio -- decent sound for the price, and tunes like a "real [analog] radio" -- thankfully with a digital display.
 
Re: A couple more things - Re: World Radio Network

There is no way that HCJB could ever qualify as a "REAL" Latin American broadcaster any more than a VOA transmitter in Central America would.
I seem to remember a <a target="_blank" href=http://www.radiobras.gov.br/>Radiobras</a> on twenty five meters from my old shortwave days. They would be a good contender if their English language service still exists.

>
> ...(HCJB would certainly qualify as a Latin American broadcaster.)
> <P ID="signature">______________
Proud 2 B a pioneering satellite radio subs¢riber
Ai4i is always on the trailing edge of technology
______________</P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom