It comes in better than channel 8 North of Canton GA., up the 575 / 515 corridor. It did come in much better on channel 18 in the analog days. How did an anolog UHF end up a digital 4?
Incentive auction.
- Trip
It comes in better than channel 8 North of Canton GA., up the 575 / 515 corridor. It did come in much better on channel 18 in the analog days. How did an anolog UHF end up a digital 4?
All of GPTV's full-power stations are on VHF, four of them on low-VHF. Most of them had been on UHF in analog days.Incentive auction.
- Trip
All of GPTV's full-power stations are on VHF, four of them on low-VHF. Most of them had been on UHF in analog days.
I'm wondering if they found they could make more money off the incentive auction by agreeing to take VHF channels. I'm not sure how all of that worked back when the auctions were taking place. WOSU Columbus got rid of their satellite WPBO Portsmouth entirely in the auctions, and were willing to throw the far southeastern counties under the bus as regards OTA in-state public TV, but then again you don't have a network in Ohio that has a mandate to cover the entire state.
By the time of the incentive auction, only two of their stations were still on UHF, WJSP and WNGH. Both won bids to move to low-VHF, which got them a significant chunk of change.
Their other stations just opted to move to VHF as part of the digital transition process. I believe the purpose was to save on cost.
- Trip
This would be a perfect test-case for migrating to ATSC-3 from ATSC-1. The stations get back their reliable coverage and, overtime, most TVs will be ATSC-3 capable any way. (This would only impact OTA viewers.)All of GPTV's full-power stations are on VHF, four of them on low-VHF. Most of them had been on UHF in analog days.
I'm wondering if they found they could make more money off the incentive auction by agreeing to take VHF channels. I'm not sure how all of that worked back when the auctions were taking place. WOSU Columbus got rid of their satellite WPBO Portsmouth entirely in the auctions, and were willing to throw the far southeastern counties under the bus as regards OTA in-state public TV, but then again you don't have a network in Ohio that has a mandate to cover the entire state.
This would be a perfect test-case for migrating to ATSC-3 from ATSC-1. The stations get back their reliable coverage and, overtime, most TVs will be ATSC-3 capable any way. (This would only impact OTA viewers.)
Whoops. I meant the GPB VHF channels.I'm not following you here.
Whoops. I meant the GPB VHF channels.
This would help the folks trying to destroy public and or educational TV. I wouldn't want my station to be the "bata" customer andm losing 20% (or whatever the OTS audience is).Do you mean that, in your scenario, GPTV would go all-ATSC 3.0?
What would OTA viewers do, the vast, vast majority of whom don't have 3.0 converters? And what about delivering a signal to cable and satellite providers? Unless there's some part I'm missing, they, too, would have to get 3.0 equipment.
This would help the folks trying to destroy public and or educational TV. I wouldn't want my station to be the "bata" customer andm losing 20% (or whatever the OTS audience is).
I am not sure if there is specific language in the original issue of Radio and TV channels back in the day but IMHO:
These licenses were issued " in the public interest". If you make money OK. If not turn the license in and the FCC will auction it off to someone who thinks they can. Another issue is weather fire and other assorted emergencies. 20% of the folks (I am part of this minority that refuses to pay $150 a month plus to the cable company) will not get warnings. May we are "expendable".
Would losing 20% of the folks and their pledges help them be viable? I am not objective when it comes to GPTV. I watch it OTA on a 5 year old set. I don't plan on replacing it until it dies. They would lose me and my donation if I had to buy a new set.Public TV stations have non-commercial licenses, and turning a profit is not an issue for them. They simply have to remain financially viable through donations and, in some cases, subsidies from various governmental entities, as they have to have enough cash flow to pay salaries, pay for programming, utilities, and so on.
I wouldn't worry about the likelihood of anything such as that happening. I predict that eventually, they are going to have to give up on ATSC 3.0. It's just not catching on.Would losing 20% of the folks and their pledges help them be viable? I am not objective when it comes to GPTV. I watch it OTA on a 5 year old set. I don't plan on replacing it until it dies. They would lose me and my donation if I had to buy a new set.
Trip, the channel numbers you’re referring to are the digital channel numbers for the stations. I was referring to the virtual channel numbers.WPXA is on channel 16. WYGA-CD is channel 29. The two are unrelated.
- Trip
The PBS stations could simply stream their signals online to make up for any loss of coverage.
Thanks, I didn't think of licensing. I know that they do the geofencing, I would like to be able to watch PBS Appalachia Virginia (based in Bristol), but it is apparently not available outside the Tri-Cities market (or possibly just the Virginia side of that market, which in Bristol could mean on one side of the street or another).Many do through the PBS app and their websites. However, they are geofenced, so you would only get the ones that cover your market. Not all of the multicasts are available due to licenisng issues.