The Voice of Reason said:
Several comments indicate that internal changes will be made in order to make the station marketable for a potential buyer.
Usually "internal changes ... to make the station marketable" mean firings. When stations get bought and sold, potential buyers are very interested in the station's yearly cash flow. You're not just buying a station, you're also buying it's track record of making or losing money. You're more likely to find a buyer when the station has a better profit margin.
Unfortunately, one of the biggest expenses at most stations is payroll -- and it's also the easiest expense to cut back. ClearChannel's a great example. When they acquired Ackerley, they axed the entire news department at WUTR so they could sell it off quickly (to meet an FCC ownership limit requirement). They also made many cuts across the board in radio, when they announced plans to sell off all stations below market 100 -- even in larger markets above 100.
Once a station gets into a habit of doing things "on the cheap" it can be nearly impossible to see it bounce back. Corporate owners -- and now increasingly often, these priviate equity groups -- are only in it for the quick buck. They want their investments to be profitable almost immediately, and a "sure but steady" profit isn't enough. These guys want to see the numbers get bigger and bigger every year. Most of them aren't broadcasting experts, they're financial experts. Unlike the local owners of the past, they don't care enough about the people or the product to understand it may take 5 or 6 years of losing investments to finally turn things around. They want a profit, and they want it now. And it better be even bigger next year. And if they can't pull it off by increasing the station's revenue, then they'll do it by axing expenses.
And consider that most owners are looking to sell the station for a higher price than they originally bought it. Every time that happens, it only sets the bar higher. Not such a problem for leading stations who are practically printing money. But it can be a disaster for the perennial #3-ranked stations out there. Remember how many cities had 2, 3, or even more daily newspapers decades ago... now to have just one? Same with AM Radio, where many cities had several had full newsrooms, but now it's just down to one or maybe two in most places. I wouldn't be surprised if WROC just ditches news altogether within the next 5-10 years.