-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
WSHM "CBS-3 Springfield" newscast to be launched in September
- Thread starter MJB13
- Start date
K
KML0224
Guest
Wouldn't it have been cheaper to keep channel 3 on western Massachusetts cable systems and just have them call their newscasts "Eyewitness News" with no "3" logo on their microphones?
S
shadowman
Guest
> Wouldn't it have been cheaper to keep channel 3 on western
> Massachusetts cable systems and just have them call their
> newscasts "Eyewitness News" with no "3" logo on their
> microphones?
>
It would be cheap, but WSHM is a cheap TV production, if you compare it to another low power station located two channels under 67!
> Massachusetts cable systems and just have them call their
> newscasts "Eyewitness News" with no "3" logo on their
> microphones?
>
It would be cheap, but WSHM is a cheap TV production, if you compare it to another low power station located two channels under 67!
S
shadowman
Guest
> According to an article in today's Springfield Republican,
> WSHM-LP will be launching a twice-daily (6pm and 11pm)
> newscast in September. Construction is underway of a "state
> of the art all-digital studio" in downtown Springfield's
> Monarch Place.
>
I wonder who will be working at their news department....
> WSHM-LP will be launching a twice-daily (6pm and 11pm)
> newscast in September. Construction is underway of a "state
> of the art all-digital studio" in downtown Springfield's
> Monarch Place.
>
I wonder who will be working at their news department....
K
KML0224
Guest
> It would be cheap, but WSHM is a cheap TV production, if you
> compare it to another low power station located two channels
> under 67!
>
Would that be a low-power station carrying Telmundo programming? Affiliated with a certain channel 13 of Hartford? Hmmm!
> compare it to another low power station located two channels
> under 67!
>
Would that be a low-power station carrying Telmundo programming? Affiliated with a certain channel 13 of Hartford? Hmmm!
S
shadowman
Guest
> > It would be cheap, but WSHM is a cheap TV production, if
> you
> > compare it to another low power station located two
> channels
> > under 67!
> >
>
> Would that be a low-power station carrying Telmundo
> programming? Affiliated with a certain channel 13 of
> Hartford? Hmmm!
>
That would be correct, my friend. You want to do LPTV right (even if the audio is not in stereo), look for WDMR LP 65! With their current ERP, they're doing miracles, compare to "SHAM". LOL
(Ok guys and gals, insert your CBS 3 Joke here)
> you
> > compare it to another low power station located two
> channels
> > under 67!
> >
>
> Would that be a low-power station carrying Telmundo
> programming? Affiliated with a certain channel 13 of
> Hartford? Hmmm!
>
That would be correct, my friend. You want to do LPTV right (even if the audio is not in stereo), look for WDMR LP 65! With their current ERP, they're doing miracles, compare to "SHAM". LOL
(Ok guys and gals, insert your CBS 3 Joke here)
- Status