M
Mark_Ericson
Guest
WSLS filed its interference resolution notice with the FCC today and opted to remain on channel 30 instead of moving back to 10.
However, I was under the impression that WSLS was facing interference from WSWP-9 in Grandview/Beckley, with a digital on 53, but they elected to move to round 2 to resolve the interference issue. Was this a failure of communication or was WSLS being impacted by WVPT-DT in Staunton? I don't understand what happened here.
- Trip<P ID="signature">______________
Visit my website, www.rabbitears.info! It's eventually going to be your one resource for television info! Digital television, histories, and technical information for the entire USA from one source!</P>
However, I was under the impression that WSLS was facing interference from WSWP-9 in Grandview/Beckley, with a digital on 53, but they elected to move to round 2 to resolve the interference issue. Was this a failure of communication or was WSLS being impacted by WVPT-DT in Staunton? I don't understand what happened here.
- Trip<P ID="signature">______________
Visit my website, www.rabbitears.info! It's eventually going to be your one resource for television info! Digital television, histories, and technical information for the entire USA from one source!</P>