secondchoice said:If you were going to continue country wouldn’t you hire a PD that had a strong county back round?
TheBigA said:He worked for the Country Music Association. I'd suggest that's a pretty strong country background.
onetake said:Just don't see Nashville really needing 3 country FM's. Atlanta 4 1/2 million with 2 Countrys Nashville metro 1 million with 3.
Tibbs2 said:why destroy a reasonably successful/profitable third country station by taking a chance and incurring great expense with another format that's probably already taken?
Tibbs2 said:Makes "one" wonder if "one" brother would directly compete against "another" brother should the pseudo-Nashaloha Trust be created.
TheBigA said:Why not? Wilks owns two competing country stations in Kansas City. Clear Channel owns two competing country stations in Austin. CBS owns two competing all news stations in NYC. So why not?
jetfli said:it makes no sense for business to allow both SM-FM and KDF to exist AS THEY ARE NOW in a combined Cumulus-Citadel cluster.
secondchoice said:If you can bill the same voice tracking, why have the expense of “live and local”. Most of the listeners can’t tell the difference.
It’s all about the money.
TheBigA said:secondchoice said:If you can bill the same voice tracking, why have the expense of “live and local”. Most of the listeners can’t tell the difference.
It’s all about the money.
Well you're right about the money, but it misses an important fact: Local talent can be used to attract money. IF they let it happen. Regardless of how you feel about this, local talent are local celebrities. They can be used that way to make personal appearances and work directly with local sponsors. It helps if the local talent is willing to do this. But if they are, talent can be part of the overall sales package.
secondchoice said:The real shame is alot of CEO's look on Air Talent (and employees too) as an just another expense that to cut .
TheBigA said:secondchoice said:The real shame is alot of CEO's look on Air Talent (and employees too) as an just another expense that to cut .
I don't think they do. CEOs don't cut local talent. That decision is left to the local GM. He decides who goes and who stays.
secondchoice said:But when a CEO, unually with the blessing of the board or directors, tells a division VP or cluster manager to cut expenses he has to know somebody will get canned.
secondchoice said:Within a couple of years except for mornings, I expect there will never be announcers working “live on the air” at either station, no matter what type of music either WSM-FM of KDF is playing. The only possible exception is programming originating in Nashville for a bunch of stations nationwide. If you can bill the same voice tracking, why have the expense of “live and local”. Most of the listeners can’t tell the difference.
jetfli said:You may have read that, but that's not what's happened in this market. The cluster here has been squeezed, and squeezed, and squeezed again.
TheBigA said:jetfli said:Then why did they ignore Tony & Kris and instead hire a full local morning staff?
Whether or not they ignored Tony and Kris, the cluster's history is the cluster's history. No use denying facts.
I suspect the main reason they ignored Tony & Kris is to be able to compete. I also suspect that in a few months. they won't have to worry about that.