• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WTAM changes website

J

JohnnyMorganWXJX

Guest
And boy does it suck! (And I'm normally mild mannered in my critiques...)
 
> And boy does it suck! (And I'm normally mild mannered in my
> critiques...)
>

I agree. Although its still not as bad as KROCK.
 
> > And boy does it suck! (And I'm normally mild mannered in
> my
> > critiques...)
> >
>
> I agree. Although its still not as bad as KROCK.

Or WKNR's. (Well, if you call THAT disaster a website ;)

Clear Channel has been reformatting every one of their station's websites - music and spoken word - to that same basic template. WHLO and WARF's sites were Borged not too long ago.

It was a given that WTAM's site would be made like this. Even still, you have to have that feeling that WTAM will eventually junk Kim Mihalik and replace her with a 19-year old intern... oh, wait. THEY DID.

- Nathan Obral
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom