M
morescrapple
Guest
Michael Graham's blabbing he got the WTKK gig.. Truth, please?
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
P
PaulYovino
Guest
> Michael Graham's blabbing he got the WTKK gig.. Truth,
> please?
>
The only one who would be real happy with that selection is Howie Carr.
Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a copy of a copy of so many other more talented conservative talk show hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners tuned to 96.9. They have to do better than that.
> please?
>
The only one who would be real happy with that selection is Howie Carr.
Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a copy of a copy of so many other more talented conservative talk show hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners tuned to 96.9. They have to do better than that.
> > Michael Graham's blabbing he got the WTKK gig.. Truth,
> > please?
> >
> The only one who would be real happy with that selection is
> Howie Carr.
Haven't heard enough of Graham yet--just a couple minutes, really--
to judge. But Carr has stuff like politics, Chump Line, Max Robins,
Menino-isms, etc. to attract me.
At least they'll be live and local 3-7 (though I'll bet he'll
continue to do the show via ISDN line from Virginia) if this is the case.
Local content though.
> Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a copy of
> a copy of so many other more talented conservative talk show
> hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners tuned to
> 96.9. They have to do better than that.
>
> > please?
> >
> The only one who would be real happy with that selection is
> Howie Carr.
Haven't heard enough of Graham yet--just a couple minutes, really--
to judge. But Carr has stuff like politics, Chump Line, Max Robins,
Menino-isms, etc. to attract me.
At least they'll be live and local 3-7 (though I'll bet he'll
continue to do the show via ISDN line from Virginia) if this is the case.
Local content though.
> Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a copy of
> a copy of so many other more talented conservative talk show
> hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners tuned to
> 96.9. They have to do better than that.
>
M
morescrapple
Guest
> > Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a copy
> of
> > a copy of so many other more talented conservative talk
> show
> > hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners tuned
> to
> > 96.9. They have to do better than that.
> >
>
spot-on. Ask Chris Berry at ABC about Graham.
> of
> > a copy of so many other more talented conservative talk
> show
> > hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners tuned
> to
> > 96.9. They have to do better than that.
> >
>
spot-on. Ask Chris Berry at ABC about Graham.
> Michael Graham's blabbing he got the WTKK gig.. Truth,
> please?
>
When did he say this, during a weekend-show fill in...? I do know I heard
him say last Fri at almost 7 pm that "I'll be back Monday" and the WTKK
site says he will be on during the 3-7 pm slot next week, at least.
No changes on the website yet
...Permanent? Who knows.
> please?
>
When did he say this, during a weekend-show fill in...? I do know I heard
him say last Fri at almost 7 pm that "I'll be back Monday" and the WTKK
site says he will be on during the 3-7 pm slot next week, at least.
No changes on the website yet
...Permanent? Who knows.
Graham is Good.
As usual, everyone here seems ready to talk bad about everyone.
I think Graham is a very talented host, and that any host needs a few weeks to get his thing going before all the bitter ones start judging him.
> > > Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a copy
>
> > of
> > > a copy of so many other more talented conservative talk
> > show
> > > hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners tuned
>
> > to
> > > 96.9. They have to do better than that.
> > >
> >
> spot-on. Ask Chris Berry at ABC about Graham.
>
As usual, everyone here seems ready to talk bad about everyone.
I think Graham is a very talented host, and that any host needs a few weeks to get his thing going before all the bitter ones start judging him.
> > > Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a copy
>
> > of
> > > a copy of so many other more talented conservative talk
> > show
> > > hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners tuned
>
> > to
> > > 96.9. They have to do better than that.
> > >
> >
> spot-on. Ask Chris Berry at ABC about Graham.
>
P
PaulYovino
Guest
Graham As In Crackers
Yeah, he is great. I even have a tag line for him:
" Listen to Michael Graham . . . Graham as in crackers " ;-)
> As usual, everyone here seems ready to talk bad about
> everyone.
>
> I think Graham is a very talented host, and that any host
> needs a few weeks to get his thing going before all the
> bitter ones start judging him.
>
>
> > > > Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a
> copy
> >
> > > of
> > > > a copy of so many other more talented conservative
> talk
> > > show
> > > > hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners
> tuned
> >
> > > to
> > > > 96.9. They have to do better than that.
> > > >
> > >
> > spot-on. Ask Chris Berry at ABC about Graham.
> >
>
Yeah, he is great. I even have a tag line for him:
" Listen to Michael Graham . . . Graham as in crackers " ;-)
> As usual, everyone here seems ready to talk bad about
> everyone.
>
> I think Graham is a very talented host, and that any host
> needs a few weeks to get his thing going before all the
> bitter ones start judging him.
>
>
> > > > Heard Graham a few times and he is just a copy of a
> copy
> >
> > > of
> > > > a copy of so many other more talented conservative
> talk
> > > show
> > > > hosts. Graham offers nothing to keep the listeners
> tuned
> >
> > > to
> > > > 96.9. They have to do better than that.
> > > >
> > >
> > spot-on. Ask Chris Berry at ABC about Graham.
> >
>
Re: Graham is Good
Now I understand. You require a host who matches your level of creativity and thoughtfulness. Its not really fair to hold Michael up to your standard, is it?
> Yeah, he is great. I even have a tag line for him:
> " Listen to Michael Graham . . . Graham as in crackers "
> ;-)
>
Now I understand. You require a host who matches your level of creativity and thoughtfulness. Its not really fair to hold Michael up to your standard, is it?
> Yeah, he is great. I even have a tag line for him:
> " Listen to Michael Graham . . . Graham as in crackers "
> ;-)
>
M
morescrapple
Guest
Graham's agent
> Now I understand. You require a host who matches your level
> of creativity and thoughtfulness. Its not really fair to
> hold Michael up to your standard, is it?
>
>
> > Yeah, he is great. I even have a tag line for him:
> > " Listen to Michael Graham . . . Graham as in crackers "
>
> > ;-)
> >
>
only reason Graham's on WTKK is the barking agent. Guy's driving P.D.'s crackers, calling EVERYWHERE, nobody else took the bait. Graham will never succeed in Boston..
> Now I understand. You require a host who matches your level
> of creativity and thoughtfulness. Its not really fair to
> hold Michael up to your standard, is it?
>
>
> > Yeah, he is great. I even have a tag line for him:
> > " Listen to Michael Graham . . . Graham as in crackers "
>
> > ;-)
> >
>
only reason Graham's on WTKK is the barking agent. Guy's driving P.D.'s crackers, calling EVERYWHERE, nobody else took the bait. Graham will never succeed in Boston..
Re: Graham's agent
The only reason I'd be inclined to agree is that his voice is a bit tiresome for FM. Like can you imagine having to listen to Depetro on 96.9?
> > Now I understand. You require a host who matches your
> level
> > of creativity and thoughtfulness. Its not really fair to
> > hold Michael up to your standard, is it?
> >
> >
> > > Yeah, he is great. I even have a tag line for him:
> > > " Listen to Michael Graham . . . Graham as in crackers "
>
> >
> > > ;-)
> > >
> >
> only reason Graham's on WTKK is the barking agent. Guy's
> driving P.D.'s crackers, calling EVERYWHERE, nobody else
> took the bait. Graham will never succeed in Boston..
>
The only reason I'd be inclined to agree is that his voice is a bit tiresome for FM. Like can you imagine having to listen to Depetro on 96.9?
> > Now I understand. You require a host who matches your
> level
> > of creativity and thoughtfulness. Its not really fair to
> > hold Michael up to your standard, is it?
> >
> >
> > > Yeah, he is great. I even have a tag line for him:
> > > " Listen to Michael Graham . . . Graham as in crackers "
>
> >
> > > ;-)
> > >
> >
> only reason Graham's on WTKK is the barking agent. Guy's
> driving P.D.'s crackers, calling EVERYWHERE, nobody else
> took the bait. Graham will never succeed in Boston..
>
- Status