• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

WTVF NPRM

Take heart NC5 OTA viewers! WTVF has filed a NPRM to amend the table of DTV allotments to substitute channel 25 for the existing channel 5 allocation. Ch-25, 1000 kW, 429 (m) HAAT. Low-band VHF is now DTV no-man's land where UHF is "PRIME" spectrum real estate. Ah the irony of it all!!
w/
 
deltas69 said:
i just love it when Watt talks like this...lol :D........but what do it all mean ???

Its all code, secret messages being passed to underground broadcast operatives.....
 
Watt Hairston said:
Take heart NC5 OTA viewers! WTVF has filed a NPRM to amend the table of DTV allotments to substitute channel 25 for the existing channel 5 allocation. Ch-25, 1000 kW, 429 (m) HAAT. Low-band VHF is now DTV no-man's land where UHF is "PRIME" spectrum real estate. Ah the irony of it all!!
w/
Thank goodness, maybe soon my wife will quit throwing the remote at me and saying, 'What's wrong with the TV,...FIX IT!'
 
Watt Hairston said:
Take heart NC5 OTA viewers! WTVF has filed a NPRM to amend the table of DTV allotments to substitute channel 25 for the existing channel 5 allocation. Ch-25, 1000 kW, 429 (m) HAAT. Low-band VHF is now DTV no-man's land where UHF is "PRIME" spectrum real estate. Ah the irony of it all!!
w/

Damn. Can't use 'em as a bad example anymore.
 
let me see...OTA means over the air..but the rest is Greek.
Maybe tv is going to jack up their modulation to 130% like many fm stations in town and start compressing the audio.

You think tv is heading to a Loudness War like radio.

Maybe channel 4 can add reverb to Demetria to give a solid rock jock in your face sound
 
Watt Hairston said:
Take heart NC5 OTA viewers! WTVF has filed a NPRM to amend the table of DTV allotments to substitute channel 25 for the existing channel 5 allocation. Ch-25, 1000 kW, 429 (m) HAAT. Low-band VHF is now DTV no-man's land where UHF is "PRIME" spectrum real estate. Ah the irony of it all!!
w/

OK...For those who are curious...I will translate as best as I can

Watt Hariston said:
Take heart NC5 OTA viewers! WTVF has filed a NPRM to amend the table of DTV allotments to substitute channel 25 for the existing channel 5 allocation.

Watt Hariston said:
Ch-25, 1000 kW, 429 (m) HAAT
Ch.25 1 million watts, 429 (m) HAAT (Height Above Average Terrain)

This means that WTVF has asked the FCC to change the assigned channel for Nashville from Channel 5 to channel 25. The FCC assigns certain channels to a given area. A broadcaster may apply for one of those available channels, ask the FCC to ammend that table, or apply for a licence in a nearby community which may allow a different channel to be used


The rest is a reference to the fact that, when TV first came out, it was all VHF (chs 2-13). TVs only could pick up those channels. A few UHF stations popped up here and there, but a viewer would need a adapter to pick up UHF stations. In the early days, may UHF stations did not survive, because no one could view them. Sometime in the mid fifties(??), the FCC required TVs to be able to pick up UHF channels.

Now, if I'm wrong, please correct me, I believe I got most of it correct though
 
Essentially true but potentially a bit confusing..

If you punch "05" on your remote to watch WTVF today, you will continue to punch 05. WTVF transmits, along with the audio & video data, a "Virtual Channel Table" that tells your TV to tell you they're channel 5. Your TV receives and acts on this signal, whether you're watching their main transmitter on 76.31MHz (what we used to call "channel 5"), or the existing Digital Replacement Translator on 686.31MHz ("channel 50"), or on the new transmitter on 536.31MHz. (presuming this week's petition is granted, and the minor change permit to cover the reallocation) They're always "Channel 5" as far as the viewer is concerned.

If you watch with a regular antenna, you may need to scan for channels again.

(but not yet. What happened was that as techguy says, WTVF asked the FCC to change their assigned frequency. Assuming the FCC agrees to do so, WTVF would next need to ask the FCC for a "minor change" to their existing facility on 76.31MHz, to specify the new frequency of 536.31MHz. Then, the FCC (presumably) approves the minor change request. Then, WTVF can order & install equipment & move to the new frequency.)

I think they'll be lucky to get this on the air by the end of the year. I'm not 100% certain the FCC will approve it. (they probably will, but I'm not 100% certain.)
 
all this sounds expensive, and the new antenna elevation looks to be close to the current antenna location but about 4 meters higher.. all of the capital cost of the vhf transmitter antenna and line is lost i would imagine
 
radionekkid said:
all this sounds expensive, and the new antenna elevation looks to be close to the current antenna location but about 4 meters higher.. all of the capital cost of the vhf transmitter antenna and line is lost i would imagine

I'm 99% sure they're using the same antenna and transmission line for DTV-5 they used to use for analog channel 5. The transmitter, on the other hand, is I suppose indeed lost.

I wouldn't be 100% certain the FCC will approve this though. I think it's VERY likely they will, but not 100% certain.
 
i don see how the c5 antenna works on ch25 although i hav been out of it for long time. How much does a transmitter of correct size cost now? I saw uHf xmtr in dc once bigger than my first home and it ran on 4160 v line,. Used 8 in transmission line too and dry gas argone i think it was .
 
radionekkid said:
i don see how the c5 antenna works on ch25 although i hav been out of it for long time. How much does a transmitter of correct size cost now? I saw uHf xmtr in dc once bigger than my first home and it ran on 4160 v line,. Used 8 in transmission line too and dry gas argone i think it was .

The channel 5 antenna won't work on 25. They'll have to replace it.

I might wild-guess they still have the transmission line up from the interim facility they were running on channel 56. That should be able to handle the power for the channel 25 facility. Probably the AC primary power for the channel 56 rig is still there too.

But they're definitely going to need a new transmitter & antenna.
 
???
I thought all of the TV stations (except some LP community stations) went to the lower part of the UHF band digital of course. IIRC this was to “free” some of the “upper” UHF frequencies for more wireless and emergency responders’ frequencies. . Using digital compression all the channels VHF and UHF were to fit in the lower UHF band. The virtual table channel would allow 2 to be 2 etc. But it would really be some digital UHF signal. I thought all of the VHF’s (except the LP community and some educational) had to “move”. I did not know the VHF’s could stay on VHF only go digital on their old frequency. Do the UHF “rabbit ears” pick up the old VHF frequencies well? IIRC one of the FCC commissioners was in favor of extending the FM band down to the old channel 5 & 6 to “clean up” the AM band.
 
secondchoice said:
???
I thought all of the TV stations (except some LP community stations) went to the lower part of the UHF band digital of course. IIRC this was to “free” some of the “upper” UHF frequencies for more wireless and emergency responders’ frequencies. . Using digital compression all the channels VHF and UHF were to fit in the lower UHF band. The virtual table channel would allow 2 to be 2 etc. But it would really be some digital UHF signal. I thought all of the VHF’s (except the LP community and some educational) had to “move”. I did not know the VHF’s could stay on VHF only go digital on their old frequency. Do the UHF “rabbit ears” pick up the old VHF frequencies well? IIRC one of the FCC commissioners was in favor of extending the FM band down to the old channel 5 & 6 to “clean up” the AM band.

I apologize for the rant below getting rather large...

- That's an unfortunately common misconception. Nearly all stations operated an interim digital facility on a different channel. (and for stations whose analog was VHF, this interim facility was usually UHF) At the end of the digital transition, stations were required to elect a permanent digital channel -- and were allowed to choose, either their interim channel or their old analog channel. In Nashville, most stations elected to remain on their interim channel. (channels 58 and 66 had no choice, as their analog channels were in the spectrum being transferred to land mobile) Channels 5 and 8, however, elected to return to their old analog channels. Indeed, channel 5 had no choice either, as their *interim* channel was in the spectrum being transferred.

(that said, some stations were able to negotiate a permanent assignment on a completely different channel. For example, channel 50, whose interim operation was on 51 and managed to land 33 for their permanent operation)

- Digital compression really didn't have anything to do with the ability to lop channels off the top of the UHF band. That became possible because of the *greatly* improved quality of UHF receivers. For example, in the old analog rules, the presence of Channel 30 in Nashville meant channels 15, 16, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 44, and 45 were all off-limits for new analog stations. This was required by the poor quality of UHF receivers in the early 1950s. (To a modern-day engineer, 1950s UHF receiver designs are unbelievably crude. To an early-1950s engineer, I suppose they figured it was a miracle UHF worked at all...)

In digital, the only channels that would be precluded by a channel 30 operation would be 29 and 31, and even those could be used if the transmitter was within a few miles of the channel 30 transmitter. (so the signals of channels 29 and 30 would be of similar strength) Indeed, we have channels 17, 21, 23, 27, 31, 33, 36, and 38 all operating in Nashville today.

Digital compression was necessary to make a digital TV signal fit in the existing 6MHz channels. An uncompressed HDTV video signal requires roughly 1500MHz of spectrum. That's more than was assigned to all 82 TV channels in the analog era... and that for only one station, and without considering audio! Digital compression makes it possible to fit that 1500MHz worth of video into a single 6MHz channel, leaving enough room for sound.

- With the old "rabbit ears" antennas, the "ears" were used for VHF. There was a round (sometimes square) loop of wire which was used for UHF. If you're restricted to an indoor antenna, this is probably still the best design. (unless you're willing to have an "outdoor" antenna in your house... I do know some people who do that!) (and actually, the attic is usually a pretty good place for an "outdoor" antenna)

You do NOT need a "digital" antenna to receive digital signals. The older antenna you used for analog reception works fine for digital reception. (as long as it was delivering reasonably decent analog pictures before the conversion) Unfortunately, many stores are telling viewers they need a "digital" antenna -- and many digital antennas are inferior to the analog antennas the viewers already had. Some digital "flat panel" antennas don't have ears and will work VERY VERY POORLY for channels 4 and 8. (and 5, except they have that UHF relay transmitter) We advise viewers with these antennas that they're probably going to have to return them to the store for a set of rabbit ears. Indeed, I heard just yesterday from a viewer who hadn't been able to get 4 and 8 in Hendersonville since the transition. She took her amplified flat panel back to the store for a set of rabbit ears -- and now not only does she get channels 4 and 8 just fine, but she doesn't get as much "breakup" on the other channels.

- I'm not so sure a Commissioner is necessarily in favor of reassigning channels 5 and 6 for FM, as that he was in favor of *investigating* the possibility of doing so.

I think it's very unlikely they'll proceed. More recent actions suggest they want to clear more UHF spectrum, and they're interested in finding ways to make VHF frequencies work better for digital. (they want to discourage moves like WTVF's - they want DTV stations that are on VHF spectrum to stay there.)

Even without the push to clear more UHF spectrum, there are some problems with a 5-6 reassignment for FM. In particular, that one or the other of those channels are in use in some fairly populated areas of the country. The use of channel 6 in Philadelphia would probably, in itself, preclude the reassignment. But there's also use of channel 6 in Albany, NY, Birmingham, New Haven (CT), and by two stations in Georgia that might (or might not) preclude the use of channel 6 in Atlanta. Even if WTVF does move to 25, the use of channel 5 for FM will be impossible west of the Tennessee River (due to WMC Memphis) and in the Knoxville and Tri-Cities areas. (due to a station in Bristol) It will also be off-limits in Des Moines, Grand Rapids, (which might preclude Chicago) Detroit & Toledo, San Antonio & Austin, Pittsburgh, and depending on the resolution of another NPRM, quite possibly Milwaukee. (which would definitely preclude Chicago)

Personally, I would favor a move to allow FM broadcasting in all five low-band VHF channels on a secondary basis to full-power TV and a co-primary basis with LPTV. If channel 5 were off limits in Nashville & Memphis, channels 2-4 and 6 could still be used.
 
I wish FM radios would pick up tv audio. If you are in a city where a tv station is on Channel 6 you can listen to the station, as I recall. I now have a car with a wx band on the radio. I have HD radio, like that does me any good.

But believe me it would have been a pleasure to be in the car lately and tune into an FM frequency right there and get Ron Howes doing non stop wx coverage or get a real newscast on the way home, in my, HEARING the tv station.

Nashville radio newsrooms are limited during the weekday to begin with. Don't even expect more much if there is a real wx issue anytime, especially at night or on weekends. The wx bands from the NWS are updated hourly but resemble listening to a cd radio.

Remember that wed night a few weeks ago when half the city was sitting with a dead cell phone and going no where? Good example. If the FCC wanted to do us "owners of the airwaves" any favors, let me HEAR WTVF, WSMV, or WKRN ... believe me, the audio of Desperate Housewvies would beat having to suffer thru the drama of Deliah any night of the week. And I'd even take Dr Phil or Oprah over some of the non stop music marathons on Nashvillle stations in the afternoon.
 
onetake said:
I wish FM radios would pick up tv audio. If you are in a city where a tv station is on Channel 6 you can listen to the station, as I recall.

For better or worse, that doesn't work anymore. When the Channel 6 stations went digital, that went out the window. (I miss being able to listen to Jay Leno over WPSD Paducah on the car radio...)

Low-power stations are allowed to continue in analog for the time being. Some of them are being operated as FM radio stations.

I now have a car with a wx band on the radio.

It's unfortunate more cars don't have this.

I have HD radio, like that does me any good.

It would, if you were in Milwaukee(grin). The TV-6 station there has arranged for their audio to be carried on the HD3 of an FM station.
 
w9wi said:
The channel 5 antenna won't work on 25. They'll have to replace it.

I might wild-guess they still have the transmission line up from the interim facility they were running on channel 56. That should be able to handle the power for the channel 25 facility. Probably the AC primary power for the channel 56 rig is still there too.

But they're definitely going to need a new transmitter & antenna.

If WTVF's petition is successful, they'll be keeping the current RF-5 facility (as a translator) in addition to lighting up with a megawatt on RF-25:

WTVF intends to seek authority to continue to operate its currently authorized Channel 5 facility as a high-power replacement digital translator (similar to the authority WTVF currently has to operate a high-power replacement digital translator on Channel 50). Consequently, the switch to digital Channel 25 will be seamless to viewers in the outer loss area who will continue to receive WTVF's signal on digital Channel 5 as they have since the Station's digital transition more than a year ago.

The entire PRM (AUG 2010) is here:

http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7020910614

It's unclear from my reading of the NPRM (DA-11-335) whether the FCC has tacitly approved the dual operation with the existing RF-5 facility should the new channel allotment be granted.
 
Bob E. Nelson said:
If WTVF's petition is successful, they'll be keeping the current RF-5 facility (as a translator) in addition to lighting up with a megawatt on RF-25:

Most interesting. First I've heard of that part of the proposal.

WLS in Chicago is trying to do the same thing. Their post-transition facility was to be on their old analog channel 7. They got their post-transition channel changed to 44, then filed to leave 7 on the air (at full power) as a DRT. The FCC hasn't acted on that request yet.

(I have to suspect it's operating under STA)
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom