I'm curious to learn the source of the rumour that Entercom actually cut back its heritage 50 kilowatter "to save money on electricity." I agree with Maestro Pastrick: not a day goes by without our getting an "avail request" from a long-form program supplier (read: colon-blow, gold coin, business/financial, psychic-mystic supplies, or religion.) If money at E-Com is really that tight they could sell the nighttime signal that covers the Northeast to the hucksters and pay the monthly electric bill in one broadcast week, IMO. Believe it or no, you could actually make money with that signal if you tried. (Not much, maybe, but some.)
I suspect the reason for the short-term cutback was technical. This is the time of year when AM operators venture out to the ATUs and discover what winter hath wrought. Being only a mile from Dreary Lake Erie, KB's overtaxed engineers may not have visited the tower bases for a few weeks, since you probably would have to use snowshoes. Who knows? Maybe a frost-heaved spark gap was too close and was arcing at 50kw but okay at 10. Or something.
I agree, if money is too tight, signing the signal off from Midnight to 6am, hours of operation not required in "unlimited hours," makes more sense than powering down to 10kw 24-7. Zap: instant 25% savings.
I suspect the reason for the short-term cutback was technical. This is the time of year when AM operators venture out to the ATUs and discover what winter hath wrought. Being only a mile from Dreary Lake Erie, KB's overtaxed engineers may not have visited the tower bases for a few weeks, since you probably would have to use snowshoes. Who knows? Maybe a frost-heaved spark gap was too close and was arcing at 50kw but okay at 10. Or something.
I agree, if money is too tight, signing the signal off from Midnight to 6am, hours of operation not required in "unlimited hours," makes more sense than powering down to 10kw 24-7. Zap: instant 25% savings.