http://www.kokomotribune.com/local/local_story_258224348.html
I don't have enough information to take sides in this matter. But it did occur to me, what costs would WWKI incur, beyond the usage of their airtime over the weekend, and some extra electricity to run the phones, lights, and cameras at the station's studios?
Similarly, why must Comcast be given half the advertising time if they would only donate it back to We Care anyway? Assuming We Care has no objection to WWKI having all the ad avails, then why must Comcast intervene? Or does Comcast just want some kind of a tax deduction by selling those avails and then donating the proceeds?
I don't have enough information to take sides in this matter. But it did occur to me, what costs would WWKI incur, beyond the usage of their airtime over the weekend, and some extra electricity to run the phones, lights, and cameras at the station's studios?
Similarly, why must Comcast be given half the advertising time if they would only donate it back to We Care anyway? Assuming We Care has no objection to WWKI having all the ad avails, then why must Comcast intervene? Or does Comcast just want some kind of a tax deduction by selling those avails and then donating the proceeds?