WWME had it's beam tilt removed this morning

[sebenste]

As of 6/9/05, 6 AM. Should be a better signal, especially in the NW.
Even out here in DeKalb, they are interfering considerably more
with WIFR-TV (CBS Rockford). So, how's it coming in where you are?

Gilbert

 

[PhilJSmith67]

> As of 6/9/05, 6 AM. Should be a better signal, especially in
> the NW.
> Even out here in DeKalb, they are interfering considerably
> more
> with WIFR-TV (CBS Rockford). So, how's it coming in where
> you are?
>
> Gilbert
>

There is a significant increase in signal where I am south of Chicago. WWME-CA is as strong as WYCC here. No snow at all.

 

[PhilJSmith67]

> There is a significant increase in signal where I am south
> of Chicago. WWME-CA is as strong as WYCC here. No snow at
> all.

Okay, now that some storms have passed, I can tell that tropo was bringing in the signal even stronger. After the conditions calmed down, it's weakened slightly. But, 23 is still noticeably stronger than before.

 

[D1075]

> > There is a significant increase in signal where I am south
>
> > of Chicago. WWME-CA is as strong as WYCC here. No snow
> at
> > all.
>
> Okay, now that some storms have passed, I can tell that
> tropo was bringing in the signal even stronger. After the
> conditions calmed down, it's weakened slightly. But, 23 is
> still noticeably stronger than before.
>
Now in NW Indiana, I think the signal was stronger before, it's pretty fuzzy here.

 

[PhilJSmith67]

> > > There is a significant increase in signal where I am
> south
> >
> > > of Chicago. WWME-CA is as strong as WYCC here. No snow
>
> > at
> > > all.
> >
> > Okay, now that some storms have passed, I can tell that
> > tropo was bringing in the signal even stronger. After the
>
> > conditions calmed down, it's weakened slightly. But, 23
> is
> > still noticeably stronger than before.
> >
> Now in NW Indiana, I think the signal was stronger before,
> it's pretty fuzzy here.

It's still stronger for me this morning, and all the tropo has definitely died out. I never used to be able to pick up MeTV throughout my first floor before -- Only the second floor.

 

[dave73]

> Now in NW Indiana, I think the signal was stronger before,
> it's pretty fuzzy here.
>
I agree too that 23 is fuzzier than before. And this is in Gary at my home.

 

[JeremyAndrews]

> > > > There is a significant increase in signal where I am
> > south
> > >
> > > > of Chicago. WWME-CA is as strong as WYCC here. No
> snow
> >
> > > at
> > > > all.
> > >
> > > Okay, now that some storms have passed, I can tell that
> > > tropo was bringing in the signal even stronger. After
> the
> >
> > > conditions calmed down, it's weakened slightly. But, 23
>
> > is
> > > still noticeably stronger than before.
> > >
> > Now in NW Indiana, I think the signal was stronger before,
>
> > it's pretty fuzzy here.
>
> It's still stronger for me this morning, and all the tropo
> has definitely died out. I never used to be able to pick up
> MeTV throughout my first floor before -- Only the second
> floor.
>

Same as always in Kenosha. Viewable with static (Better then WYCC) on an indoor antenna. Most likely clear with an outdoor antenna. I know WOCH can be seen clear with an outdoor antenna up here. My house's outdoor antenna was busted when I moved in so I have no idea. 13, 23 and 28 were crisp clear on an outdoor antenna in Zion last time I used an outdoor antenna there in 2001. 34 was as well.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P><P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by JeremyAndrews on 06/20/05 07:49 AM.</FONT></P>

 

[b344077]

The signal across the lake in Michigan is very snowy and not watchable where before it was OK.