I believe that's true, but the interesting question remains why are they using the AM transmitters at all?
Because the network ad business model still uses terrestrial stations and the number & size of markets cleared.
I believe that's true, but the interesting question remains why are they using the AM transmitters at all?
Once it's indisputably proven that BIN is a ratings calamity with almost no listener support, advertisers will smartly move their spending to other outlets geared toward reaching African American audiences.
There's no "void" being filled by BIN. Great national morning shows such as Steve Harvey and the Breakfast Club already discuss the hot topics that are of interest to African American listeners. Al Sharpton's midday radio show also airs in numerous markets with sizable African American populations.
So, any notion that examination of current events from an African American point of view wasn't previously available on the radio dial is hogwash.
The programming on BIN is absolutely tedious. Weak programming + mostly crappy AM radio signals = short shelf life, in my opinion.
They could do far more by putting some programming on their big stations.
This is about attracting new money. The advertisers who've signed up for this could have sponsored other iHeart programming, but this is what they wanted. They already have all the old white men locked in listening to their news/talk programming. This is aimed at someone else.
My guess is iHeart wants to make it look like they are doing something meaningful for political reasons more than actually doing anything. Throwing this network on a few marginal AM signals around the country and some FM HD2, HD3 - yeah a few people will listen, maybe a few will listen on the iHeart app. but its not going to do much. It may get them some national ad sales from companies who want to show support for the cause.
They could do far more by putting some programming on their big stations...
Once again, they're not looking for local ratings, but national reach. The purchase price for WWRL was a whole lot less than WABC.
BigA - I have listened to the national feed and honestly, I am disappointed. They should walk away now, because OUR nation deserves better.
AllAccess reports that IHeart will be paying around 8.5 million dollars for the station.
8 million was what a poor signal AM in NYC would go for about 50 years ago. Times have certainly changed.In Covid terms that's like buying the last 4-pack of toilet paper in the supermarket for $8.50 knowing you could have bought the 48-pack of Charmin on sale a month earlier for $12.
Total speculation, but the work probably has to do with some cleanup work at the transmitter site in Secaucus. As for the translator, I don't think they could get it much closer to NYC with co-channel WNBM there. It's really directional as currently proposed, in consideration of WNBM, the station in Hazlet (WPDI) and some second adjacents.
The seller, NJ Broadcasting, bought the station 4 years ago, for seven million dollars. Though they will apparently make a modest profit from the sale, the deal stipulates that IHeart can withold $275,000 unless certain repairs and upgrades are made to the station.
I'm surprised that IHeart didn't buy WLIB AM, which appears to have a better signal, and is said to be for sale.
8 million was what a poor signal AM in NYC would go for about 50 years ago. Times have certainly changed.
In 1978 I had a signed deal to buy WTFM, a near-full signal FM in NYC, for $7.8 million.
That's the point. Forget AM, is there an FM station that someone would pay $90 million for today in NYC? I don't think so.For perspective:
$7.8 million in 1978 is worth $30.7 million today.
$40 million in 1988 is worth $87.3 million today.
Source: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm