I Was Listening To Kiss 108 Today And I Noticed That The Audio Sounded Different Then Normal. It Sounded Almost Robotic. Did Anyone Else Notice Anything Different? It Sounded Like This For The Past Couple Of Days
I've noticed, it's a turn offchrisradioanimal said:I Was Listening To Kiss 108 Today And I Noticed That The Audio Sounded Different Then Normal. It Sounded Almost Robotic. Did Anyone Else Notice Anything Different? It Sounded Like This For The Past Couple Of Days
LA_Guy said:In the '80s and '90s, KISS-108 had the BEST on air audio anywhere. Most of their audio processing was custom-and sounded it-GREAT! These days, it's just a generic Omnia processor.
McRadio at its finest!
Oldbones said:Part of the problem today is the the way the music is mixed and processed at the recording studio. Unfortunately, the producers process it to sound "good" (and I use the term very loosely here) on an mp3 player. Sounds like crap on a good stereo, but who has a good stereo today? Between mp3s, web streaming and satellite radio, good audio is a lost art. And very few people seem to care.
diamondj said:I notice the jock breaks as sounding funny, almost robotic as the original poster mentioned. It's kind of tinny like listening to a compresssed digital file when the DJ speaks, whereas to me the music on Kiss sounds "normal."
LA_Guy said:In the '80s and '90s, KISS-108 had the BEST on air audio anywhere. Most of their audio processing was custom-and sounded it-GREAT! These days, it's just a generic Omnia processor.
McRadio at its finest!
Retro said:LA_Guy said:In the '80s and '90s, KISS-108 had the BEST on air audio anywhere. Most of their audio processing was custom-and sounded it-GREAT! These days, it's just a generic Omnia processor.
McRadio at its finest!
Now you are joking, right?