I
ibezdechi
Guest
Perhaps it is an oversight but XHUPN is not listed in the latest issue of Television Week as affiliating with MyNetwork...
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
K
KMRichards
Guest
> Perhaps it is an oversight but XHUPN is not listed in the
> latest issue of Television Week as affiliating with
> MyNetwork...
Oh, so now we are acting as proofreaders for industry publications?
<u>Who cares</u> if something is or isn't listed in the trades? Maybe the announcement didn't get to them in time for deadline ...<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> latest issue of Television Week as affiliating with
> MyNetwork...
Oh, so now we are acting as proofreaders for industry publications?
<u>Who cares</u> if something is or isn't listed in the trades? Maybe the announcement didn't get to them in time for deadline ...<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
E
engineering
Guest
> Who cares if something is or isn't listed in the trades?
> Maybe the announcement didn't get to them in time for
> deadline ...
>
Found this on tv week today:
The new agreements include five stations currently affiliated with UPN: Bay City Television's XUPN-TV in San Diego (26); Journal Broadcasting's WACY-TV in Green Bay-Appleton, Wis. (69); WBGT, LLC's WBGT-TV in Rochester, N.Y. (79); Cox Television and Broadcast Development's KAME-TV in Reno, Nev. (112); and GH Broadcasting's KTOV-TV in Corpus Christi, Texas (129).
> Maybe the announcement didn't get to them in time for
> deadline ...
>
Found this on tv week today:
The new agreements include five stations currently affiliated with UPN: Bay City Television's XUPN-TV in San Diego (26); Journal Broadcasting's WACY-TV in Green Bay-Appleton, Wis. (69); WBGT, LLC's WBGT-TV in Rochester, N.Y. (79); Cox Television and Broadcast Development's KAME-TV in Reno, Nev. (112); and GH Broadcasting's KTOV-TV in Corpus Christi, Texas (129).
I
ibezdechi
Guest
> > Perhaps it is an oversight but XHUPN is not listed in the
> > latest issue of Television Week as affiliating with
> > MyNetwork...
> Oh, so now we are acting as proofreaders for industry
> publications?
KM...ah...where did that comment come from?
I simply made an observation that they were not listed in the latest issue of Television Week, which is, of course, covering extensively the subject of the new net coming up. They were listing the announced affiliates as of March 17th and I was legitimately raising the spector that despite XHUPN/49 (Cable 13) being owned Entravision and their affiliation for XETV/6 being with FOX, that them affiliating with the new MyNetwork may not be a foregone conclusion and that this media conglomerate may have other plans for the signal.
> Who cares if something is or isn't listed in the trades?
> Maybe the announcement didn't get to them in time for
> deadline ...
Maybe so, no disrespect intended, but I was hoping that my contribution would cause a discourse or a discussion on what is a pretty quiet board. I thought this was a radio and TV broadcasting discussion board....or is it???
> > latest issue of Television Week as affiliating with
> > MyNetwork...
> Oh, so now we are acting as proofreaders for industry
> publications?
KM...ah...where did that comment come from?
I simply made an observation that they were not listed in the latest issue of Television Week, which is, of course, covering extensively the subject of the new net coming up. They were listing the announced affiliates as of March 17th and I was legitimately raising the spector that despite XHUPN/49 (Cable 13) being owned Entravision and their affiliation for XETV/6 being with FOX, that them affiliating with the new MyNetwork may not be a foregone conclusion and that this media conglomerate may have other plans for the signal.
> Who cares if something is or isn't listed in the trades?
> Maybe the announcement didn't get to them in time for
> deadline ...
Maybe so, no disrespect intended, but I was hoping that my contribution would cause a discourse or a discussion on what is a pretty quiet board. I thought this was a radio and TV broadcasting discussion board....or is it???
I
ibezdechi
Guest
> > Who cares if something is or isn't listed in the trades?
> > Maybe the announcement didn't get to them in time for
> > deadline ...
> >
>
>
> Found this on tv week today:
>
> The new agreements include five stations currently
> affiliated with UPN: Bay City Television's XUPN-TV in San
> Diego (26); Journal Broadcasting's WACY-TV in Green
> Bay-Appleton, Wis. (69); WBGT, LLC's WBGT-TV in Rochester,
> N.Y. (79); Cox Television and Broadcast Development's
> KAME-TV in Reno, Nev. (112); and GH Broadcasting's KTOV-TV
> in Corpus Christi, Texas (129).
So there...we had a elucidation of my question...what I expected from my earlier...
Breathe?
> > Maybe the announcement didn't get to them in time for
> > deadline ...
> >
>
>
> Found this on tv week today:
>
> The new agreements include five stations currently
> affiliated with UPN: Bay City Television's XUPN-TV in San
> Diego (26); Journal Broadcasting's WACY-TV in Green
> Bay-Appleton, Wis. (69); WBGT, LLC's WBGT-TV in Rochester,
> N.Y. (79); Cox Television and Broadcast Development's
> KAME-TV in Reno, Nev. (112); and GH Broadcasting's KTOV-TV
> in Corpus Christi, Texas (129).
So there...we had a elucidation of my question...what I expected from my earlier...
Breathe?
K
KMRichards
Guest
> > > Perhaps it is an oversight but XHUPN is not listed in
> the
> > > latest issue of Television Week as affiliating with
> > > MyNetwork...
>
> > Oh, so now we are acting as proofreaders for industry
> > publications?
>
> KM...ah...where did that comment come from?
Read what you wrote. It comes off as a nitpick of Television Week.
> I simply made an observation that they were not listed in
> the latest issue of Television Week, which is, of course,
> covering extensively the subject of the new net coming up.
> They were listing the announced affiliates as of March 17th
> and I was legitimately raising the spector that despite
> XHUPN/49 (Cable 13) being owned Entravision and their
> affiliation for XETV/6 being with FOX, that them affiliating
> with the new MyNetwork may not be a foregone conclusion and
> that this media conglomerate may have other plans for the
> signal.
If you look at Chip Kelley's grid, you would have seen that not only is XHUPN/49 confirmed as a MyNetwork affiliate, they have applied for a call letter change to XHDTV.
Realistically, what you say above would, in my mind, make it even more a foregone conclusion that the affiliation would take place, given that Fox owns MyNetwork.
> Maybe so, no disrespect intended, but I was hoping that my
> contribution would cause a discourse or a discussion on what
> is a pretty quiet board. I thought this was a radio and TV
> broadcasting discussion board....or is it???
Well, it did cause a discussion, just not exactly the one you expected.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> the
> > > latest issue of Television Week as affiliating with
> > > MyNetwork...
>
> > Oh, so now we are acting as proofreaders for industry
> > publications?
>
> KM...ah...where did that comment come from?
Read what you wrote. It comes off as a nitpick of Television Week.
> I simply made an observation that they were not listed in
> the latest issue of Television Week, which is, of course,
> covering extensively the subject of the new net coming up.
> They were listing the announced affiliates as of March 17th
> and I was legitimately raising the spector that despite
> XHUPN/49 (Cable 13) being owned Entravision and their
> affiliation for XETV/6 being with FOX, that them affiliating
> with the new MyNetwork may not be a foregone conclusion and
> that this media conglomerate may have other plans for the
> signal.
If you look at Chip Kelley's grid, you would have seen that not only is XHUPN/49 confirmed as a MyNetwork affiliate, they have applied for a call letter change to XHDTV.
Realistically, what you say above would, in my mind, make it even more a foregone conclusion that the affiliation would take place, given that Fox owns MyNetwork.
> Maybe so, no disrespect intended, but I was hoping that my
> contribution would cause a discourse or a discussion on what
> is a pretty quiet board. I thought this was a radio and TV
> broadcasting discussion board....or is it???
Well, it did cause a discussion, just not exactly the one you expected.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
I
ibezdechi
Guest
> Read what you wrote. It comes off as a nitpick of
> Television Week.
>
> > I simply made an observation that they were not listed in
> > the latest issue of Television Week, which is, of course,
> > covering extensively the subject of the new net coming up.
>
> > They were listing the announced affiliates as of March
> 17th
> > and I was legitimately raising the spector that despite
> > XHUPN/49 (Cable 13) being owned Entravision and their
> > affiliation for XETV/6 being with FOX, that them
> affiliating
> > with the new MyNetwork may not be a foregone conclusion
> and
> > that this media conglomerate may have other plans for the
> > signal.
>
> If you look at Chip Kelley's grid, you would have seen that
> not only is XHUPN/49 confirmed as a MyNetwork affiliate,
> they have applied for a call letter change to XHDTV.
(see above)
That might be find but I was just raising a question from a trusted industry source and was inquiring whether anyone heard otherwise.
>
> Realistically, what you say above would, in my mind, make it
> even more a foregone conclusion that the affiliation would
> take place, given that Fox owns MyNetwork.
KM, you of all people should know that nothing is predictable in the broadcasting industry....
>
> > Maybe so, no disrespect intended, but I was hoping that my
>
> > contribution would cause a discourse or a discussion on
> what
> > is a pretty quiet board. I thought this was a radio and
> TV
> > broadcasting discussion board....or is it???
>
> Well, it did cause a discussion, just not exactly the one
> you expected.
>
> Television Week.
>
> > I simply made an observation that they were not listed in
> > the latest issue of Television Week, which is, of course,
> > covering extensively the subject of the new net coming up.
>
> > They were listing the announced affiliates as of March
> 17th
> > and I was legitimately raising the spector that despite
> > XHUPN/49 (Cable 13) being owned Entravision and their
> > affiliation for XETV/6 being with FOX, that them
> affiliating
> > with the new MyNetwork may not be a foregone conclusion
> and
> > that this media conglomerate may have other plans for the
> > signal.
>
> If you look at Chip Kelley's grid, you would have seen that
> not only is XHUPN/49 confirmed as a MyNetwork affiliate,
> they have applied for a call letter change to XHDTV.
(see above)
That might be find but I was just raising a question from a trusted industry source and was inquiring whether anyone heard otherwise.
>
> Realistically, what you say above would, in my mind, make it
> even more a foregone conclusion that the affiliation would
> take place, given that Fox owns MyNetwork.
KM, you of all people should know that nothing is predictable in the broadcasting industry....
>
> > Maybe so, no disrespect intended, but I was hoping that my
>
> > contribution would cause a discourse or a discussion on
> what
> > is a pretty quiet board. I thought this was a radio and
> TV
> > broadcasting discussion board....or is it???
>
> Well, it did cause a discussion, just not exactly the one
> you expected.
>
- Status
- This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.