• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Yikes…97.1 😱

I drove down to TJ on the 4th to avoid the loud banging, when I tuned around the dial I noticed that San Diego’s 97.3 was carrying the same blather that was on Yikes! 97.1. Not sure what it was. It was around 11am to Noon.
 
K.M. Richards said:
When I express an opinion that has no citeable basis in fact, I say so. I don't hide behind verbiage such as "which some found questionable".

This is how rumors become "fake news". It starts with someone posting their personal view as if it were fact, and then the Internet spreads it around. That is the only reason I bring this up ... it has to stop, and the only way that it will is if all of us are more vigilant about not inadvertently starting rumors.

Just my opinion. Your mileage may vary.
Click to expand...
I think you had too much coffee this morning! Your overreacting! I merely implied that I myself including members of my own family found those call letters "questionable" so I found it safe to assume that there might be others as well.
 
TomásEstefan said:
I think you had too much coffee this morning! Your overreacting! I merely implied that I myself including members of my own family found those call letters "questionable" so I found it safe to assume that there might be others as well.
Click to expand...

Actually, I have had no coffee yet today (which is unusual for me, but there was too much happening here this morning for me to even think about my morning meal).

I only overreact because I am sick and tired of these rumors being innocently started. I appreciate your explanation, and only wish you had said it that way in the first place.
 
michael hagerty said:
I mean, there have been worse ideas.

True story:

Back in the 1990s, Clear Channel took 100.3 R&B Oldies and had a listener contest—"send in entries for the new station name and we’ll choose it at random."

(Yeah....sure.)

The announcement came: It was “MEGA 100”.

That night, Phil Hendrie did the first 15 minutes of his show on KFI about how relieved everyone in the building was that, miraculously, the winning entry just happened to be the number one name for that format on radio stations all over the country.

“I mean, what if they’d pulled out the random winner and it was “Asshole 100”? Man, we dodged a bullet!”
Click to expand...
It's pretty unbelievable they would just choose a name from listeners at random for a full powered FM in Los Angeles. Like they just randomly picked the most popular name for the format. I'm sure it was decided beforehand.

Reminds me of when Garry Wing bought KWXY and KKGX, and announced a website to vote for what the new formats will be. In the end, he admitted he already knew that it would be Standards and Talk. It was strictly to engage interest and attention from the public.
 
I remember when they had that contest to name the station. They spoke to the woman who won on air. She said she came up with the name Mega after her church pastor gave a sermon called "God is Mega." I'm thinking the woman was probably a Clear Channel employee who was told to make up a good story.
 
radio128 said:
I remember when they had that contest to name the station. They spoke to the woman who won on air. She said she came up with the name Mega after her church pastor gave a sermon called "God is Mega." I'm thinking the woman was probably a Clear Channel employee who was told to make up a good story.
Click to expand...

There's another possibility, equally as likely, I think.

They had already decided on "Mega", discarded all of the entries that suggested anything else, and then randomly chose from the ones that already matched the decision. That way, they could still say with a straight face that the winning entry was "chosen at random" ... after all, they didn't say "from all entries received".
 
KilowattKat said:
It's pretty unbelievable they would just choose a name from listeners at random for a full powered FM in Los Angeles. Like they just randomly picked the most popular name for the format. I'm sure it was decided beforehand.
Click to expand...

That’s what the (“Yeah…sure”) and Hendrie’s rant were about.

KilowattKat said:
Reminds me of when Garry Wing bought KWXY and KKGX, and announced a website to vote for what the new formats will be. In the end, he admitted he already knew that it would be Standards and Talk. It was strictly to engage interest and attention from the public.
Click to expand...
 
As we know, iHeart did the same when they put 107.9 back on the air in Sacramento. I admit it was fun back then listening to the wheel of various formats while stunting. Asking listeners to go and vote for their favorite one online. I don't recall the format they ended up with even being one of the choices.
 
I don’t know if this was the case with Mega (I was listening to Hendrie in Phoenix—-that massive KFI signal), but almost every new station—-on the day they launch—-has a dozen or so “real people” shoutouts—“I love the variety”—-“you guys play more music”—-“(station name) rocks!”——-all of which clearly were staged and recorded in advance because the station just went on the air.

The really dumb ones run them in the first hour. But I guess not many people question it, because they keep doing it.
 


Back
Top Bottom