• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Z100 UNVEILS NEW LOGO & LINEUP FOR JINGLE BALL 2010

Wow, guess we know what the guy that designed that awful (and rescinded) new Gap logo is doing now...these are *awful*!

Any logo made with a font that comes with Microsoft Word really should be given a second once-over...
 
pjc1961 said:
Meanwhile CC sister stations KTU & Q104~3 have remained the same.

Does this mean 103.5 can stop calling themselves "the NEW KTU"? :D
 
Yuck, who decided to change the logo? The old one was great! CC has certainly been hiring lazy people to do their logos now.
 
Something I noticed on the new site, it looks a lot like the new CBS Radio website layout that have launched earlier this year. Could CC be changing website layouts?
 
The new Z logo makes the station feel like a Hot AC brand. The new Power logo looks like a Top 40 station style. Either way, Logo FAIL!
 
The z 100 Portland logo is better. This new logo for z100 NY looks old to me. But this is my opinion. I like the 92.3 Now FM logo or 97.1 AMP Radio logo much better.

And I could now see 92.3 Now FM saying on air. "NOW who has the better logo" ;)
 
Now that Z100's got that crappy new logo, the next thing that'll happen is they'll re-hire Steve Kingston and take the station alternative-based.
 
Lee Anderson said:
It looks very corperate. Not very creative.

Now I know radio is a business and all.....but come on...really? My logo for my internet station is 100X better than that!
 
Call me crazy but I kinda like it!....I don't understand what was wrong with the existing logo...such a BRAND built with it...but it's also been the same since the 90s...guess they felt a change might be needed

But all in all I don't mind it!
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom