Some of these statements are laughable. Particularly when there are stations in town making a mint programming to a demographic on WELFARE.
So tell us, what stations program to predominantly welfare recipients?
Some of these statements are laughable. Particularly when there are stations in town making a mint programming to a demographic on WELFARE.
The only hope you might have is if Liberman implodes, sells their stations, and a new owner tries Oldies on one of the rimshots as part of an overall cluster marketing strategy. Chances of success: very low.
Before we hear the predictable references to KLUV: DFW has a half-dozen more viable commercial FM signals than Houston, so there is more room for format variety.
Liberman is not gonna implode any time soon
As for viable signals, DFW vs Houston?? Maybe a difference of 3 max (28 vs 25 that I count). Not half dozen.
The 107.1 in DFW and the yet-to-be-upgraded 103.3 in Houston are probably marginal for these lists, but you still have the same difference.
DFW has a more rational frequency plan, while Houston is hampered by some large gaps between stations.
Ok, I must have slightly miscounted on the Dallas signals (which I am quite familiar with too) but.........in the DFW area, 104.1 is gone (though plenty of Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed..but its out of the FCC DB now)...now a LPFM is on channel close to FTW but that doesn't count and the Sanger signal was never viable..
I am happy for the KRBE fans in South Dallas, they got their station back! Hey - if the golden Triangle can use up a frequency for one listener of gospel music, a few dozen people in South Dallas are entitled to KRBE. And the two listeners of KLUV I know about in Houston are entitled to 98.7.
A more rational allotment would help for Houston - what happened to the concept of massive frequency swaps so a new station can move in? The process that opened 107.5 for Houston in the 80's comes to mind.
Some of these statements are laughable. Particularly when there are stations in town making a mint programming to a demographic on WELFARE.
So what stations are you talking about Bruce? I would love to know.
I asked the same and got no answer.
I didn't answer because the thread could turn racial. Time to move on.
I didn't answer because the thread could turn racial. Time to move on.
For someone who is so holier than thou, you wrote a check that your behind can't cash. If you are trying to say that Majic and The Box stay at the top of the ratings because black folk who you may THINK are poor is a sad misconception. Don't you think they stay near the top because they have music that appeals to everyone. Again the facts are Bruce, that most fans of hip hop today are white suburbanites. Again this all goes back to what I have been saying all along....perception ain't right but its real.
I never attached a race to welfare recipient. You folks did that in your posts.
I didn't answer because the thread could turn racial. Time to move on.
I didn't answer because the thread could turn racial. Time to move on.........................I never attached a race to welfare recipient. You folks did that in your posts. You assumed I meant black - so your minds associate welfare recipient with black. That is racist. Welfare recipients can be all races. Like I said - time to move on.
You seem to want to move on because you cannot answer your own statement because you really back yourself into a corner and have no way out without enjoying the taste of leather....if this was a discussion (or hijack) of oldies, you would not be stopping...but you put yourself in this spot...so answer the question......
"Quote Originally Posted by rbrucecarter5"
Some of these statements are laughable. Particularly when there are stations in town making a mint programming to a demographic on WELFARE.
So tell us, what stations program to predominantly welfare recipients?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THAT was the question you have yet to answer........because YOU said it would turn racial.