The radio pros who participate on the R.D. boards have a wealth of knowledge and I truly have learned a good deal from the, especially years ago when civility ruled. I don’t like broad brushing as this doesn’t apply to all the radio pros or avid listeners. Remember your school days where you handed in a homework paper only to have it returned to you filled with red marks? You felt demoralized. It’s not a great way to learn either. Then there were teachers who gave you credit and acknowledged what you did correctly. They also included what you did wrong. That method is more conducive to learning. I’m still learning about a lot of things to include radio. Differences of opinion are healthy and they make reading the posts interesting. However, "red marking" certain sentences or paragraphs while never citing any type of agreement is not the way to go. In business, any manager who only coaches employees on negative things will probably have a lot of turnover.
I don't always read Fred Jacobs' blog every day, but today's posting seems appropriate to add here: "The Smartest Guy In The Room Is..."
At the same time, I don't think Mr. Eduardo was being overly harsh in his comments and minor corrections of fact. Nit-picky, maybe, but please remember where he's coming from. He has made available online the broadest assortment of historical radio documentation I know. It literally is like the big stacks of books that used to be in university libraries. When the libraries starting ditching this material, he rescued it. That doesn't even touch his five decades in radio broadcasting.
That said, I will call out and have called out arrogant and condescending attitudes on this board from people with far more experience in the field than myself. I've had just enough experience and background to be considered dangerous.
Please keep posting. I've enjoyed your observations.
Last edited: