• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

New York radio in 2020

WNYL is the only outlet for a full time Alternative station with a signal that is not limited to areas where the demographic listens to Rhythmic formats.

Q104.3 is a Classic rock station with an aging demo.

Two completely different formats with virtually no similarities. WNYL reaching a younger demo.
 
Two completely different formats with virtually no similarities. WNYL reaching a younger demo.

Neither station is in the Top 5 for any demographic, including 18-34 or 18-49. So if Alt is reaching a younger demo, it's a smaller share of that demo than most other stations.

My sense is there aren't other formats available that could reach a sellable demo.
 
I think in some places rock can do well with large black and Hispanic populations look at Detroit and WDRV and WXRT in Chicago Or 98 Rock in Baltimore
 
I think in some places rock can do well with large black and Hispanic populations look at Detroit and WDRV and WXRT in Chicago

Rock has been tried many times in NYC and failed. It would be very hard to make a strong financial case for flipping to rock based on the track record.

It's not like the format hasn't been tried.
 
i am wondering how does WAXQ does in 25-54 compared to other NYC iheart stations. in Philadelphia iheart flipped 106.1 several times in recent years
 
billing is iheart considering changing format any time soon

I doubt it. A format change has considerable costs:

1. Severance and other internal charges related to staff, lost commissions, etc.
2. Startup costs ranging from logo design to legal fees on registering service marks, changing call letters, etc.
3. A year of lost revenue while the new format gets established and starts selling if it works.

Overall revenue loss in NYC would be in the $20 million range.

A new format bills very little in its first months. Even if it starts to get numbers, most agencies buy multi-month rolling averages, based on 4, 5, 6 or more months. It will take a good while to get back to the former billing levels, and even longer to recover the loss of revenue.

In the meantime, management at the local level loses incentive bonuses as revenue takes a big hit.

All the iHeart FMs are billing very well. There is no reason to change.
 
i am wondering how does WAXQ does in 25-54 compared to other NYC iheart stations. in Philadelphia iheart flipped 106.1 several times in recent years

It's top 5 in 25-54 men. That is a good sales number. Overall, the station is a big biller.
 
i am wondering how does WAXQ does in 25-54 compared to other NYC iheart stations.

My sense is it delivers the male half of that demo, while WLTW delivers the female half.

Classic rock is drawing a younger demo on average than classic hits, as evidenced by WMGK in Philly.
 
I think in some places rock can do well with large black and Hispanic populations look at Detroit and WDRV and WXRT in Chicago Or 98 Rock in Baltimore
My guess is that those radio stations are successful because of listeners who live in the suburbs. For example, Detroit's population is overwhelmingly African-American (82.7%); however, the Detroit metropolitan area is 70.1% white.
 
My guess is that those radio stations are successful because of listeners who live in the suburbs. For example, Detroit's population is overwhelmingly African-American (82.7%); however, the Detroit metropolitan area is 70.1% white.

Exactly. African-American and Hispanic listeners are poor prospects for any non-rhythmic format.
 
My guess is that those radio stations are successful because of listeners who live in the suburbs. For example, Detroit's population is overwhelmingly African-American (82.7%); however, the Detroit metropolitan area is 70.1% white.

You would be an idiot not to program a Spanish language format on a full market fm signal in NYC, we have 3. How many does Detroit have? It's the right amount for that market. Each market is so different not just demographically but lifestyle, attitude, traditions...these two Detroit Vs. NYC are crazy different but even markets that do line up if many ways still are not carbon copies. All that NYC (entercom because only 92.3 would have a chance of changing) gets from Detroit is how much their breeze station is taking from their classic hits WOMC. That might be used to start a study of how a breeze would work on 923 and what kind of effect it would have on CBS-fm, but it's really just a stepping stone on the path to if they could co-exist and thrive.
 
Exactly. African-American and Hispanic listeners are poor prospects for any non-rhythmic format.

Yet the leading Spanish language station in LA is AC, not rhythmic. And it is followed by several Regional Mexican stations, also not rhythmic.

It all depends on the market.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom