• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Alt 92.3

There needs to be some form of revenue stream as required by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Otherwise they are illegally playing music without permission or license.

Not really. Sniffen reportedly pays out of his own pocket to run Rewind Radio with no ads, as a nonprofit online hobby station with the necessary music licensing for example.
 
Not sure what you mean.
They dont repeat it when they play it fri/sat/mon/tue.
They only repeat it back to back on sundays.
CTListener meant that SiriusXM does not have separate feeds for the East Coast and the West Coast, unlike the broadcast TV networks. The first broadcast is for the East and the second is for the West; however, every subscriber can listen to both.
 
CTListener meant that SiriusXM does not have separate feeds for the East Coast and the West Coast, unlike the broadcast TV networks. The first broadcast is for the East and the second is for the West; however, every subscriber can listen to both.
But im not sure why that changes why sometimes they repeat the countdown & sometimes they dont.
 
Home Depot has its own in-house music system that it pipes in to all its stores. Same with CVS and WalMart.

Some may offer stores alternate music formats for certain geographical areas.
I know the "Rock & Roll Ralphs" (Kroger grocery store) in Hollywood plays...you guessed it...classic rock :cool:

same. Why would a store put on a radio station with limited playlists, chatter and commercials when you have millions of internet stations with none of that? It's sad for us afficionados but traditional radio is slowly dying.
There are music licensing exemptions for stores under 2,000 square feet and restaurants under 3,750 square feet, but ONLY if it's from a television or radio. Those exemptions do not apply if you're playing music from a CD, MP3 or streaming service. Sure, it might be nice to have no commercials, but catch ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC on the wrong day and you are likely out of business tomorrow.
There are many online stations that don't play commercials
Anyone can start a Live365 account, upload their music library and call themselves an internet radio station. If you pay Live365 $400 per month, you can even get listed on the iHeart app. But at the end of the day, no one works for free...Radio stations used to be called licenses to print money. These streams are quite the opposite.
 
Radio stations used to be called licenses to print money. These streams are quite the opposite.
In over 60 years in radio, I never heard having a station license being compared to a license to print money. As far back as the FCC tabulations of the annual required financial reports, about half of all US radio stations do not make money. I suspect that the percentage is even higher today.
 
In over 60 years in radio, I never heard having a station license being compared to a license to print money. As far back as the FCC tabulations of the annual required financial reports, about half of all US radio stations do not make money. I suspect that the percentage is even higher today.
Is this hyperbole, or is there something more to the idea that "half of all US radio stations do not make money"? I thought in the good old Musicradio days, any 1000 watt station with good DJs could make a tidy profit serving their community. In the current era, individual (mostly AM) stations may not make money, but the overall corporate owner does, due to the fact they provide a platform for national advertising. I would think even the recently departed WNSH made money, just not enough of it to justify being on NYC FM signal. Does the half of the US stations that 'do not make money' include religious or public/community broadcasters? - they are not in the business to be making money.
 
In over 60 years in radio, I never heard having a station license being compared to a license to print money. As far back as the FCC tabulations of the annual required financial reports, about half of all US radio stations do not make money. I suspect that the percentage is even higher today.
In its prime, industry executives often referred to the "World Famous KROQ" as one such station that was in essence a license to print money. Those days, of course, have gone the way of the cassette.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom