How is KNX going, now that it's on 97.1?
Presuming that the single-line reporting doesn't hide the separated numbers, I'm sure David can answer. On that subject ...Realizing that the audience hasn't really grown, I am just curious to see if the numbers had shifted between the two signals.
He can't give you the actual numbers. The legal agreement with Nielsen forbids their public release. But he should be able to use those numbers to say whether or not they have improved against KYSR in the key demos.Maybe David could also give us the "real" numbers for KROQ. In 6+ they are slowly crawling up, a whopping 1.5 share.
Inside Radio just published some of those numbers: KROQ is No. 13 in 18-34 and No. 11 in 25-54 in the March survey.Maybe David could also give us the "real" numbers for KROQ. In 6+ they are slowly crawling up, a whopping 1.5 share.
Those aren't the ratings (which is what is generally understood as being "the numbers"), those are the rankings. That has always been allowed, and indeed how David usually answers questions about a station's performance in-demo.Inside Radio just published some of those numbers: KROQ is No. 13 in 18-34 and No. 11 in 25-54 in the March survey.
We don't know that and won't know it unless the station orders a cu$tom report and releases the data.Realizing that the audience hasn't really grown, I am just curious to see if the numbers had shifted between the two signals.
The cume has averaged 1.1 million since the Holiday book, about 100,000 to 150,000 higher than it was for most of 2021.Was the KNX cume as high as it is now prior to the simulcast.
No. 11 in 25 to 54 isn't horrible; better than I assumed.Inside Radio just published some of those numbers: KROQ is No. 13 in 18-34 and No. 11 in 25-54 in the March survey.
KROQ is No. 13 in 18-34 and No. 11 in 25-54 in the March survey.
This is likely the reason Weatherly was brought back on. The station is sitting outside Top 10 in some of these key demos. Very few format holes in the market for profitable formats that attract younger demos means Audacy would rather try another alternative reclamation project than a flip. Why risk it for a new format that might take years to get to KROQ's performance?No. 11 in 25 to 54 isn't horrible; better than I assumed.
That's the key question and the truth. You don't blow up a heritage station except as a last resort. Not only does it take time, it takes a lot more resources -- especially in the area of promotion -- to essentially start a "new station" before making every effort to fix what you already have.Why risk it for a new format that might take years to get to KROQ's performance?
And #11 and #13 in the key demos, in market #2, certainly is not a completely hopeless situation.