"Obviously Peacock sucks," an exec with knowledge of both companies said. "There are some good synergies. I'm sure [Roberts] is licking his chops because the [WBD] stock is so low. And I think that's Zaslav's endgame. Get the place sold." A spokesperson for Warner Bros. Discovery responded, "We are building Warner Bros. Discovery for the long term."
www.forbes.com
You mean you don't completely trust info from the distinguished journalists at www.giantfreakinrobot.com, which is the site the link to the "report" leads to?Someone arguing the economics for why it should happen is quite different than an unsourced bit of rambling from random internet site du jour.
That says more about you than you might think.I trust giantfreakingrobot.com as much as I trust Forbes!
In my view, there are too many downsides to this rumored merger. Having to divest profitable divisions to attain approval to take on unprofitable cable assets, would be a fools errand.
There was literally nothing to trust in the Forbes piece. That’s the point. It’s one author’s pontificating over a hypothetical. The other site is just idiotically pretending they have some kind of information…devoid of any factual basis.Grampa, if you think Forbes is a publication with cachet, you're well behind the times. It's been a pay-to-play publisher of random articles from so-called "contributors" for at least 10 years and possibly longer.
Because as goes professional wrestling, so goes the nation. All of life's a work. I cannot thank RadioDiscussions enough for guiding me to these ultimate truths.Why would they?
I don't think that would be possible with Comcast in the picture (And they're NOT going to part with NBC that easily)Details here. Apparently the cost trimming they've been doing is to make such a merger happen, even though Warner/Discovery is $50 billion in the red. We'll see where this goes.
Viacom and CBS were always sister companies.I remember a few years ago that there were talks that NBC should get Paramount and CBS should get Lionsgate Studios but that became proven false once Paramount Got CBS and for some time was named as ViacomCBS in the Interim until the current Name Paramount Inc was finalized.
True it's the Redstones that are named as majority investors via their National Amusements name and their history in managing the then Viacom and then CBS inc when they were separate companies before they chose to remerge the companies in response to Disney taking over 20th Century Studios.Viacom and CBS were always sister companies.
I can't see NBCU merging with WBD. Neither company can afford it.