He forgets about those things called "mountains" to the north & east of KSCO 
End quote from that news article: "I’ve been painted as the bad guy, when I should be getting a medal.”<...>
And the material misrepresentations just keep on comin'!"
It's the most optimistic coverage estimate I think I've ever seen.He forgets about those things called "mountains" to the north & east of KSCO![]()
Well, that's not even mentioned in the piece.End quote from that news article: "I’ve been painted as the bad guy, when I should be getting a medal.”
Bad guy? For running a station for decades without proper authorization?
And, if I remember correctly, that was a while ago, so a lower noise floor...I used to be able to hear it during the day when I lived in Sacramento on a GE Superadio… albeit not that well.
Yes that was long long ago.And, if I remember correctly, that was a while ago, so a lower noise floor...
But "north of Sacramento and south of Bakersfield" daytime?
That's the answer to the question "what would the reception for KNX be if we moved the stick from Torrance to Madera?"
50,000 watts at 1070? Maybe. 10,000 at 1080? Not a chance.Yes that was long long ago.
Interesting thought about KNX from Madera. It’s not the best part of the Central Valley for ground conductivity, but I could almost picture coverage from south of Bakersfield to north of Sacramento at least for radio geeks.
KYNO 940's 50kw does Bakersfield to Sacramento with no problem. Their4 tower array is on good ground, closer to Visalia than to Fresno.50,000 watts at 1070? Maybe. 10,000 at 1080? Not a chance.
And that’s 50kw at 940, not 10kw at 1080.KYNO 940's 50kw does Bakersfield to Sacramento with no problem. Their4 tower array is on good ground, closer to Visalia than to Fresno.
It occurs to me that you may have been commenting on my "maybe" to KNX covering that area, not to KSCO's owner's claim.KYNO 940's 50kw does Bakersfield to Sacramento with no problem. Their4 tower array is on good ground, closer to Visalia than to Fresno.
I'm just curious to know if these AM 'daytimer' stations are still on the air. Given their state of affairs, my bet would be 'has anything changed?'<...>
"local programming is going away" nowhere in the radio insight article or the local newspaper article does it say the station is going dark, in fact... quite the opposite, Zwerling says they will probably pick up syndicated programming
50 kw on 1600 will bareley equal the coverage of 1 kw on 550, given identical transmitter locations and electrical wavelength of towers.It occurs to me that you may have been commenting on my "maybe" to KNX covering that area, not to KSCO's owner's claim.
Still, at 50 kw with comparable ground conductivity, I think 940 has an advantage over 1070. @DavidEduardo has outlined the power/frequency equation here a bunch of times and I still can't seem to memorize it.
Okay, so because math is hard, how much of advantage would 50kw have at 940 over the same power at 1070?50 kw on 1600 will bareley equal the coverage of 1 kw on 550, given identical transmitter locations and electrical wavelength of towers.
About 10% to 12%, I think. The difference in coverage vs. frequency is relatively linear.Okay, so because math is hard, how much of advantage would 50kw have at 940 over the same power at 1070?
At some point, there needs to be a FAQ thread in the engineering section of the forum. This really should be an early entry into that thread.50 kw on 1600 will barely equal the coverage of 1 kw on 550, given identical transmitter locations and electrical wavelength of towers.
Another reason comparing 940 & 1070 signal is not valid. 1070 is non-directional 24/7 and 940 is directional 24/7.
KYNO's day & night pattern puts most of the signal up & down the Central Valley & out to the coast Not must to the east.