• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

PGA to merge with Saudi-backed LIV Golf

And a big part of this has to do with the declining participation of Americans in golf, particularly younger ones.

This is what the PGA used to do. They invested in youth programs for golf. Now I see that kind of thing happening in hockey.

The point is these are expensive sports. Playing golf is expensive. You can't do it on the street. You need a golf course,

That's why investment from the sport is important. Now that the sport is going to make profits means less investment in youth.
 
And a big part of this has to do with the declining participation of Americans in golf, particularly younger ones.

The patio of my home looks out at the Nicklaus Course at PGA West, and I see plenty of golfers... all with $10,000 carts and thousands invested in clubs who pay around $300 for a T-Time or $125 thousand for a golf membership... and realize this is not a game for "the masses".
It never has been. The popularity of Tiger Woods sparked a very brief, and largely futile, push to get urban minority youth to take up golf, but it is a very expensive sport to take part in. You can play public courses cheaply, but the costs of equipment and instruction are prohibitive for most. Tennis, the other "country club" sport, has done much better in that regard. The sport not only has Black stars and role models; it also can be played on asphalt courts in cities, and many high schools have tennis courts and varsity teams.
 
That's why investment from the sport is important. Now that the sport is going to make profits means less investment in youth.
Or the international management of golf finds profitable ways of commercializing youth golf and figures out how to make it playable in densely populated urban areas.

In Quito, with over a million people when I was there, we had one golf course. In the Palm Springs / Coachella Valley metro area with just over 400 thousand people, we have over 125 full golf courses and countless driving ranges, too.
 
What the Devil does the PGA think it's doing? Selling out to a nation that violates human rights?!
They are not selling out. If you see a tank coming towards you, you step out of the way.
 
And you're okay with that?

Profits over people. If a dictatorship has the money, then we should go with that.

Again, I don't give a whit about the sport of golf, but this bothers me. Apparently I'm alone in this.
No, you're not alone. I'll repeat what I wrote up above: If I gave a rat's ass about golf I'd be highly offended. But I've been highly offended by the Saudi regime for decades. The reasons are legion. Supporting (or more accurately, trying to buy off) terrorists so they'd leave *them* alone. Fighting a proxy war in a neighboring country. Wahabbiism. Killing and dismembering Jamal Kashoggi in Saudi's Turkish embassy. Expecting the US military to be their mercenary army. Shall I continue? (That was just off the top of my head, no research necessary, no Googles harmed in the making of this post.)
 
Bringing this subject to television:

The PGA Tour has TV deals with CBS, NBC, and (usually for the first two rounds of many PGA Tour events) the Golf Channel (the latter is owned by NBC/Universal), whereas the rival LIV Tour has had some recent tournaments telecast on The CW.

How will television coverage of the merged tour be divided-up? Will the CW end up being shut out of the combined PGA/LIV tour? Might CBS and/or NBC each lose a handful of (likely lesser) tournaments so that the CW can still carry some professional golf?
 
Bringing this subject to television:

The PGA Tour has TV deals with CBS, NBC, and (usually for the first two rounds of many PGA Tour events) the Golf Channel (the latter is owned by NBC/Universal), whereas the rival LIV Tour has had some recent tournaments telecast on The CW.

How will television coverage of the merged tour be divided-up? Will the CW end up being shut out of the combined PGA/LIV tour? Might CBS and/or NBC each lose a handful of (likely lesser) tournaments so that the CW can still carry some professional golf?
PGA Tour deals will remain the same. LIV might end up folded into the European (DP World) Tour next year for the most part, and end up on Golf Channel. CW deal is a revenue-sharing deal and there hasn't been revenue to share.
 
If I gave a rat's ass about golf I'd be highly offended.

(Was it Daffy Duck who used to say "That's a revolting development"?)
Maybe, but the phrase "What a revoltin' development this is!" belongs to one Chester A. Riley, the lead character on The Life of Riley, played by Jackie Gleason (NBC-TV, 1949-50) and more famously by William Bendix on radio (1944-51), a movie (1949), and a later (1953-58, also on NBC) TV show.
 
Bringing this subject to television:

The PGA Tour has TV deals with CBS, NBC, and (usually for the first two rounds of many PGA Tour events) the Golf Channel (the latter is owned by NBC/Universal), whereas the rival LIV Tour has had some recent tournaments telecast on The CW.

How will television coverage of the merged tour be divided-up? Will the CW end up being shut out of the combined PGA/LIV tour? Might CBS and/or NBC each lose a handful of (likely lesser) tournaments so that the CW can still carry some professional golf?
“This is an exciting day to unify and grow the game of golf,” The CW said in a statement provided to Deadline. “There is no change to the LIV Golf event schedule for 2023 on The CW.” Seven more events remain on the network’s docket. The LIV-CW deal runs through 2024, with a one-year extension option.
 
So much for taking the moral high ground!
The PGA warned players that joined LIV they would be punished. Now the ones who stayed(and didn't take the money)are being forced in. This is a very bad look for the PGA, especially since the players weren't involved in the process.

As for the Political component of this, the US has no moral compass anymore. A former President thinks Putin is a hero. Nobody remembers the Saudi involvement in 9/11 or even cares. Just gotta keep that oil coming out of the sand(or sand trap--bunker in Golf lingo...)
 
Last edited:
The PGA warned players that joined LIV they would be punished. Now the ones who stayed(and didn't take the money)are being forced in. This is a very bad look for the PGA, especially since the players weren't involved in the process.
So will all professional golfers now be free to play in any tournament they want to, whether it's branded "PGA" or "LIV"? Will the LIV tournaments continue to be 54 holes instead of 72? Will the entire LIV schedule run on the same weekends as the PGA's? In short, will the current rosters of the PGA and LIV Golf mean anything post-merger, or will they be more like WWE's Raw and Smackdown rosters, a gimmick designed to draw eyeballs to two separate television programs, with the rosters selected in a choreographed "draft"?
 
So will all professional golfers now be free to play in any tournament they want to, whether it's branded "PGA" or "LIV"? Will the LIV tournaments continue to be 54 holes instead of 72? Will the entire LIV schedule run on the same weekends as the PGA's? In short, will the current rosters of the PGA and LIV Golf mean anything post-merger, or will they be more like WWE's Raw and Smackdown rosters, a gimmick designed to draw eyeballs to two separate television programs, with the rosters selected in a choreographed "draft"?
No.
Yes, at least this year. 2024 is up in the air.
Yes. The PGA Tour plays every weekend.
Yes. LIV players will have to apply to rejoin (or join) the PGA Tour, under a formula yet to be determined.
 
This is what the PGA used to do. They invested in youth programs for golf. Now I see that kind of thing happening in hockey.
There has been much discussion and concern in hockey forums I read that the sport has become too expensive and that youth participation is declining. All that equipment costs a lot of money. Other sports are cheap in comparison.
The point is these are expensive sports. Playing golf is expensive. You can't do it on the street. You need a golf course,
And in hockey you need an ice rink, and ice time can be expensive as well.
 
And in hockey you need an ice rink, and ice time can be expensive as well.

Which is why teams build what they call practice facilities in suburban areas, and leave the rinks open for high schools and groups to use. They partner with city parks departments to oversee the scheduling.

The same thing could be done with golf. Community golf courses owned by the city or county instead of country clubs. This is done in some areas, but it requires taxpayer money.
 

Now a Member of the US Senate responds to the planned merger of LIV and PGA.

 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom